Rank History for Pittsburgh Spring Hill K-5
Compare
Rank History for all students at Pittsburgh Spring Hill K-5
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
PA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2003 |
58.45 |
633rd |
1302 |
51.4% |
|
2004 |
29.94 |
1010th |
1308 |
22.8% |
|
2005 |
21.15 |
1097th |
1299 |
15.6% |
|
2006 |
25.62 |
1297th |
1545 |
16.1% |
|
2007 |
27.72 |
1293rd |
1555 |
16.8% |
|
2008 |
41.65 |
1124th |
1551 |
27.5% |
|
2009 |
32.14 |
1256th |
1549 |
18.9% |
|
2010 |
29.13 |
1308th |
1579 |
17.2% |
|
2011 |
20.24 |
1397th |
1597 |
12.5% |
|
2012 |
23.09 |
1342nd |
1599 |
16.1% |
|
2013 |
7.06 |
1389th |
1519 |
8.6% |
|
2014 |
5.59 |
1351st |
1467 |
7.9% |
|
2015 |
13.64 |
1261st |
1474 |
14.5% |
|
2016 |
16.44 |
1293rd |
1554 |
16.8% |
|
2017 |
13.39 |
1319th |
1547 |
14.7% |
|
2018 |
16.00 |
1282nd |
1530 |
16.2% |
|
2019 |
11.29 |
1345th |
1544 |
12.9% |
|
2021 |
5.45 |
1354th |
1433 |
5.5% |
|
2022 |
7.31 |
1408th |
1534 |
8.2% |
|
2023 |
13.65 |
1291st |
1534 |
15.8% |
|
2024 |
14.21 |
1292nd |
1526 |
15.3% |
|
See the entire list of
Pennsylvania Elementary School Rankings!
Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Pittsburgh Spring Hill K-5
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
PA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2023 |
14.33 |
1242nd |
1414 |
12.2% |
|
2024 |
10.31 |
1317th |
1432 |
8.0% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Pennsylvania Elementary Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!
Rank History for White students at Pittsburgh Spring Hill K-5
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
PA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2024 |
0.48 |
1228th |
1229 |
0.1% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Pennsylvania Elementary Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: Pennsylvania Dept of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.