Behavioral Continuum

Public, Alternative PK, KG-12

 540 Farview Avenue
       Paramus, NJ  07652-4832


(201) 343-6000

District: Bergen County Special Services School District

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $56,358 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  5.5 Help
Number of students:  111

Racial breakdown:

White:
36.0%
Hispanic:
30.6%
African American:
27.0%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  26.1% Help


 See top rated New Jersey public schools

 Compare Behavioral Continuum to nearby alternative schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Behavioral Continuum is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2010 the calculated Average Standard Score was 0.92. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Behavioral Continuum is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2010 the calculated Average Standard Score was 3.92. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Behavioral Continuum is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2010 the calculated Average Standard Score was 0.21. (See more...)
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Student population at Behavioral Continuum is diverse. Racial makeup is: White (36%), Hispanic (30.6%), African American (27%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 26.1% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Behavioral Continuum is 5.5, which is the 2nd best among 0 alternative schools in the Bergen County Special Services School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Behavioral Continuum employs 20 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Behavioral Continuum is $56,358. 4 alternative schools in the Bergen County Special Services School District spend more per student.
Schooldigger Rankings:

Behavioral Continuum was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.



What do you think?

Your rating for Behavioral Continuum?

Rank History for Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools NJ State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2003 0.29 1196th 1204 0.7%
2010 0.92 1344th 1354 0.7%
See the entire list of New Jersey Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: New Jersey Dept. of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools NJ State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2003 1.75 556th 574 3.1%
2009 4.84 627th 664 5.6%
2010 3.92 642nd 677 5.2%
See the entire list of New Jersey Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: New Jersey Dept. of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools NJ State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2009 0.22 366th 370 1.1%
2010 0.21 367th 371 1.1%
See the entire list of New Jersey Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: New Jersey Dept. of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Behavioral Continuum Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    






Data source: New Jersey Dept. of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Behavioral Continuum.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Behavioral Continuum, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 314 70 6 20 1 n/a n/a 0 411
1989 302 68 9 17 0 n/a n/a 0 396
1990 260 67 7 26 0 n/a n/a 0 360
1991 258 75 6 29 0 n/a n/a 0 368
1992 236 88 6 42 0 n/a n/a 0 372
1993 220 83 7 31 0 n/a n/a 0 341
1994 237 92 3 46 0 n/a n/a 0 378
1995 235 74 1 40 1 n/a n/a 0 351
1996 235 74 1 40 1 n/a n/a 0 351
1998 190 80 3 46 0 n/a n/a 0 319
1999 174 75 17 37 1 n/a n/a 0 304
2000 182 73 5 40 0 n/a n/a 0 300
2001 140 72 2 35 1 n/a n/a 0 250
2002 123 65 4 34 0 n/a n/a 0 226
2003 123 65 4 34 0 n/a n/a 0 226
2004 105 69 6 44 0 n/a n/a 0 224
2005 106 90 10 56 0 n/a n/a 0 262
2006 111 84 7 47 0 n/a n/a 0 249
2007 104 70 7 67 0 n/a n/a 0 248
2008 88 78 13 78 0 n/a n/a 0 257
2009 79 57 7 66 0 2 2 0 213
2010 78 64 6 58 1 2 2 0 211
2011 56 27 5 60 1 0 0 0 149
2012 51 27 4 47 1 1 1 0 132
2013 51 32 3 40 1 2 0 0 129
2014 45 29 6 51 1 1 3 0 136
2015 47 31 4 49 1 0 2 0 134
2016 53 28 5 37 1 0 3 0 127
2017 46 27 2 40 0 0 4 0 119
2018 31 28 6 43 0 0 1 0 109
2019 39 28 6 41 0 0 3 0 117
2020 52 16 5 49 2 0 6 0 130
2021 49 30 4 47 0 0 3 0 133
2022 39 24 3 27 0 0 3 0 96
2023 40 30 4 34 0 0 3 0 111

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 411 61.0 6.7 n/a
1989 396 63.0 6.2 n/a
1990 360 56.0 6.4 9.2
1991 368 58.0 6.3 17.1
1992 372 57.0 6.5 27.2
1993 341 46.0 7.4 21.7
1994 378 57.0 6.6 29.6
1995 351 59.0 5.9 27.4
1996 351 59.0 5.9 27.4
1998 319 54.6 5.8 29.8
1999 304 53.7 5.7 25.3
2000 300 53.5 5.6 42
2001 250 53.7 4.7 32.4
2002 226 40.0 5.7 43.4
2003 226 40.0 5.7 43.4
2004 224 47.0 4.8 37.1
2005 262 45.0 5.8 n/a
2006 249 44.0 5.7 35.7
2007 248 40.0 6.2 34.3
2008 257 8.0 32.1 43.2
2009 213 43.7 2.2 50.7
2010 211 38.0 5.5 55.5
2011 149 33.0 4.5 26.8
2012 132 45.4 2.9 31.8
2013 129 26.6 4.8 19.4
2014 136 28.1 4.8 28.7
2015 134 28.0 4.7 32.1
2016 127 26.0 4.8 27.6
2017 119 26.1 4.5 31.1
2018 109 26.3 4.1 22.9
2019 117 19.2 6.0 20.5
2020 130 21.0 6.1 18.5
2021 133 21.5 6.1 23.3
2022 96 20.0 4.8 13.5
2023 111 20.0 5.5 26.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Behavioral Continuum

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 411 61.0 6.7 n/a
1989 396 63.0 6.2 n/a
1990 360 56.0 6.4 9.2
1991 368 58.0 6.3 17.1
1992 372 57.0 6.5 27.2
1993 341 46.0 7.4 21.7
1994 378 57.0 6.6 29.6
1995 351 59.0 5.9 27.4
1996 351 59.0 5.9 27.4
1998 319 54.6 5.8 29.8
1999 304 53.7 5.7 25.3
2000 300 53.5 5.6 42
2001 250 53.7 4.7 32.4
2002 226 40.0 5.7 43.4
2003 226 40.0 5.7 43.4
2004 224 47.0 4.8 37.1
2005 262 45.0 5.8 n/a
2006 249 44.0 5.7 35.7
2007 248 40.0 6.2 34.3
2008 257 8.0 32.1 43.2
2009 213 43.7 2.2 50.7
2010 211 38.0 5.5 55.5
2011 149 33.0 4.5 26.8
2012 132 45.4 2.9 31.8
2013 129 26.6 4.8 19.4
2014 136 28.1 4.8 28.7
2015 134 28.0 4.7 32.1
2016 127 26.0 4.8 27.6
2017 119 26.1 4.5 31.1
2018 109 26.3 4.1 22.9
2019 117 19.2 6.0 20.5
2020 130 21.0 6.1 18.5
2021 133 21.5 6.1 23.3
2022 96 20.0 4.8 13.5
2023 111 20.0 5.5 26.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Behavioral Continuum

Help

YearExpenditures from Federal FundsExpenditures from State and Local FundsTotal Expenditures Per Pupil (All Funds)
2019 $450 (0.8%) $55,908 (99.2%) $56,358

Data source: New Jersey Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Behavioral Continuum

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students117111
 5.1%
African American2830
 7.1%
American Indian00
Asian64
 33.3%
Hispanic4134
 17.1%
Pacific Islander00
White3940
 2.6%
Two or More Races33
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients20.5%26.1%
 5.6%


Schools Near Behavioral Continuum









Frequently Asked Questions about Behavioral Continuum

In the 2022-23 school year, 111 students attended Behavioral Continuum.

Students at Behavioral Continuum are 36% White, 31% Hispanic, 27% African American, 4% Asian, 3% Two or more races.


Rate Behavioral Continuum!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Behavioral Continuum!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the New Jersey Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 20 milliseconds.