Eagle Tree Continuation

Summary:

Eagle Tree Continuation is a small public high school in Carson, California, serving just 30 students in grades 9-12. As part of the Los Angeles Unified school district, which is ranked 909 out of 1,560 districts in the state, Eagle Tree Continuation faces significant challenges compared to nearby high schools.

Eagle Tree Continuation has a highly diverse student population, with 80% Hispanic, 8.57% African American, 5.71% Asian, and 5.71% Pacific Islander students. However, the school consistently ranks in the bottom 10% of California high schools, with only 3.7% of students proficient or better in English Language Arts and 0% proficient or better in Mathematics. The school has struggled with low graduation rates, ranging from 22.7% to 81.8% over the past five years, and an extremely high chronic absenteeism rate of 51.1% to 72.2%. In contrast, nearby schools like Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation Academy, Phineas Banning Senior High, and Nathaniel Narbonne Senior High perform significantly better on these metrics.

As a continuation school, Eagle Tree Continuation likely serves a population of students who have struggled in traditional high school settings, which may contribute to its lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and chronic absenteeism issues. The school's small size, high proportion of disadvantaged students (83.33% qualify for free or reduced-price lunch), and continuation school status may all be factors influencing its relatively poor outcomes compared to the surrounding schools in the Los Angeles Unified district.


Detail:

Public 9-12

 22628 South Main St.
       Carson, CA  90745-4514


(310) 549-0970

District: Los Angeles Unified

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $13,785 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  7.7 Help
Number of students:  31

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:
71.0%
African American:
19.4%
Asian:
6.5%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  93.5% Help


 See top rated California public schools

 Compare Eagle Tree Continuation to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Eagle Tree Continuation is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2023 the calculated Average Standard Score was 7.2. (See more...)
Help
The four-year cohort graduation rate measures the percentage of students at Eagle Tree Continuation who earn a standard high school diploma within four years of starting ninth grade.
Help
The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Racial makeup is: Hispanic (71%), African American (19.4%), Asian (6.5%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 93.5% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Eagle Tree Continuation is 7.7, which is the 7th best among 158 high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Eagle Tree Continuation employs 4 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Eagle Tree Continuation is $13,785, which is the 75th highest among 158 high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Schooldigger Rankings:

Eagle Tree Continuation was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Los Angeles Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Los Angeles Unified 871st of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Eagle Tree Continuation?

Rank History for Eagle Tree Continuation

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Eagle Tree Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 21.58 1205th 1653 27.1%
2005 21.32 1347th 1901 29.1%
2006 17.03 1564th 1968 20.5%
2007 20.17 1498th 2063 27.4%
2008 18.54 1599th 2117 24.5%
2009 17.95 1871st 2238 16.4%
2010 19.26 1646th 2281 27.8%
2011 16.12 1795th 2367 24.2%
2012 15.23 1807th 2354 23.2%
2013 13.52 1956th 2426 19.4%
2016 8.85 1950th 2039 4.4%
2017 11.61 1721st 2021 14.8%
2018 9.13 1954th 2017 3.1%
2019 12.82 1866th 2133 12.5%
2022 9.72 2070th 2123 2.5%
2023 7.20 2256th 2348 3.9%
See the entire list of California High School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Eagle Tree Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 9.76 1778th 1862 4.5%
2022 10.40 1878th 1943 3.3%
2023 6.74 2181st 2247 2.9%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Female students at Eagle Tree Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 6.85 1754th 1760 0.3%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for Male students at Eagle Tree Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 9.67 1730th 1834 5.7%
2022 10.26 1838th 1916 4.1%
2023 7.28 2112th 2207 4.3%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for Hispanic students at Eagle Tree Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 8.20 1740th 1742 0.1%
2022 9.92 1791st 1861 3.8%
2023 6.98 2050th 2142 4.3%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Hispanic Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Eagle Tree Continuation Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 



Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Eagle Tree Continuation.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Eagle Tree Continuation, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Eagle Tree Continuation

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 16 20 8 15 1 n/a n/a 0 60
1989 7 14 7 15 1 n/a n/a 0 44
1990 7 13 9 16 0 n/a n/a 0 45
1991 17 11 12 25 0 n/a n/a 0 65
1992 17 11 13 30 1 n/a n/a 0 72
1993 4 15 13 59 1 n/a n/a 0 92
1994 6 13 11 37 0 n/a n/a 0 67
1995 5 16 10 42 0 n/a n/a 0 73
1996 5 16 10 42 0 n/a n/a 0 73
1997 2 11 11 27 0 n/a n/a 0 51
1998 3 20 8 22 0 n/a n/a 0 53
1999 5 17 6 33 0 n/a n/a 0 61
2000 0 11 11 40 1 n/a n/a 0 63
2001 6 22 9 26 0 n/a n/a 0 63
2002 5 14 13 38 1 n/a n/a 0 71
2003 5 14 13 38 1 n/a n/a 0 71
2004 9 22 11 44 0 n/a n/a 0 86
2005 4 21 12 41 0 n/a n/a 0 78
2006 5 20 19 40 0 n/a n/a 0 84
2007 5 18 15 41 0 n/a n/a 0 79
2008 2 16 13 48 n/a n/a n/a 0 79
2009 3 17 5 63 1 4 2 0 95
2010 3 15 2 75 1 4 2 0 102
2011 6 23 3 83 1 9 2 0 127
2012 4 16 1 99 0 11 0 0 131
2013 7 23 9 109 2 9 0 0 159
2014 5 25 11 96 1 7 0 0 145
2015 5 15 6 85 0 4 5 0 120
2016 0 6 2 42 0 3 2 0 55
2017 1 8 3 60 0 0 2 0 74
2018 0 8 8 52 0 2 1 0 71
2019 0 10 3 50 0 6 0 0 69
2020 1 9 3 45 0 3 1 0 62
2021 1 11 2 49 0 2 2 0 67
2022 0 3 2 28 0 2 0 0 35
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30
2024 0 6 2 22 0 1 0 0 31

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Eagle Tree Continuation

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 60 2.0 30.0 n/a
1989 44 3.0 14.6 n/a
1990 45 4.0 11.2 n/a
1991 65 4.0 16.2 n/a
1992 72 4.1 17.5 20.8
1993 92 2.8 32.9 22.8
1994 67 3.0 22.3 31.3
1995 73 3.0 24.3 35.6
1996 73 3.0 24.3 35.6
1997 51 3.0 17.0 25.5
1998 53 3.0 17.7 35.8
1999 61 3.0 20.3 50.8
2000 63 3.0 21.0 20.6
2001 63 3.0 21.0 49.2
2002 71 3.0 23.7 57.7
2003 71 3.0 23.7 57.7
2004 86 3.0 28.7 57
2005 78 3.0 26.0 70.5
2006 84 3.4 24.7 66.7
2007 79 3.0 26.3 44.3
2008 79 4.2 18.8 43
2009 95 3.4 21.6 56.8
2010 102 4.0 25.5 52
2011 127 n/a n/a 49.6
2012 131 3.0 43.5 n/a
2013 159 4.5 35.3 44.7
2014 145 4.5 32.2 47.6
2015 120 4.0 30.0 41.7
2016 55 5.0 11.0 63.6
2017 74 3.0 24.6 85.1
2018 71 3.5 20.2 80.3
2019 69 4.0 17.2 78.3
2020 62 n/a n/a 83.9
2021 67 3.0 22.3 85.1
2022 35 3.5 10.0 88.6
2023 30 3.5 8.4 83.3
2024 31 4.0 7.7 93.5

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Eagle Tree Continuation

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 60 2.0 30.0 n/a
1989 44 3.0 14.6 n/a
1990 45 4.0 11.2 n/a
1991 65 4.0 16.2 n/a
1992 72 4.1 17.5 20.8
1993 92 2.8 32.9 22.8
1994 67 3.0 22.3 31.3
1995 73 3.0 24.3 35.6
1996 73 3.0 24.3 35.6
1997 51 3.0 17.0 25.5
1998 53 3.0 17.7 35.8
1999 61 3.0 20.3 50.8
2000 63 3.0 21.0 20.6
2001 63 3.0 21.0 49.2
2002 71 3.0 23.7 57.7
2003 71 3.0 23.7 57.7
2004 86 3.0 28.7 57
2005 78 3.0 26.0 70.5
2006 84 3.4 24.7 66.7
2007 79 3.0 26.3 44.3
2008 79 4.2 18.8 43
2009 95 3.4 21.6 56.8
2010 102 4.0 25.5 52
2011 127 n/a n/a 49.6
2012 131 3.0 43.5 n/a
2013 159 4.5 35.3 44.7
2014 145 4.5 32.2 47.6
2015 120 4.0 30.0 41.7
2016 55 5.0 11.0 63.6
2017 74 3.0 24.6 85.1
2018 71 3.5 20.2 80.3
2019 69 4.0 17.2 78.3
2020 62 n/a n/a 83.9
2021 67 3.0 22.3 85.1
2022 35 3.5 10.0 88.6
2023 30 3.5 8.4 83.3
2024 31 4.0 7.7 93.5

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Eagle Tree Continuation

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $13,785

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Eagle Tree Continuation

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Ranks 1866th of 2133 High schoolsRanks 2256th of 2348 High schools
 8.6%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Eagle Tree Continuation)03.7
 3.7%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Los Angeles Unified)51.748.9
 2.8%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)57.355.4
 1.9%
11th Grade Mathematics (Eagle Tree Continuation)00
   11th Grade Mathematics (Los Angeles Unified)25.320
 5.4%
   11th Grade Mathematics (California)32.227.4
 4.9%
12th Grade Science (Eagle Tree Continuation)3.90
 3.9%
   12th Grade Science (Los Angeles Unified)8.216.6
 8.5%
   12th Grade Science (California)25.626.8
 1.2%

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students6930
 56.5%
African American100
 100%
American Indian00
Asian30
 100%
Hispanic500
 100%
Pacific Islander60
 100%
White00
Two or More Races00
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients78.3%83.3%
 5.1%


Schools Near Eagle Tree Continuation









Frequently Asked Questions about Eagle Tree Continuation

In the 2023-24 school year, 31 students attended Eagle Tree Continuation.

Students at Eagle Tree Continuation are 71% Hispanic, 19% African American, 6% Asian, 3% Pacific Islander.


Rate Eagle Tree Continuation!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Eagle Tree Continuation!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 67 milliseconds.