Con Amore School

Public, Alternative PK, KG-12

 325 E Main St
       Myton, UT  84052


(435) 725-4750

District: Duchesne District


Student/teacher ratio:  17.0 Help
Number of students:  68

Racial breakdown:

White:
67.6%
Hispanic:
17.6%
Two or more races:
8.8%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  64.7% Help


 See top rated Utah public schools

 Compare Con Amore School to nearby alternative schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Con Amore School is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 26.49. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Con Amore School is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 46.6. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details Con Amore School is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 20.06. (See more...)
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Finance
Schooldigger Rankings:

Con Amore School was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Duchesne District:

SchoolDigger ranks Duchesne District 68th of 98 Utah school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Con Amore School?

Rank History for Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools UT State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2008 40.55 343rd 498 31.1%
2009 58.56 235th 509 53.8%
2010 51.01 287th 518 44.6%
2011 34.69 428th 563 24.0%
2012 42.27 404th 579 30.2%
2013 26.49 479th 576 16.8%
See the entire list of Utah Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: Utah State Office of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools UT State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2008 22.95 178th 200 11.0%
2009 22.06 183rd 205 10.7%
2010 43.31 146th 201 27.4%
2011 50.68 137th 222 38.3%
2012 47.57 167th 238 29.8%
2013 46.60 168th 243 30.9%
See the entire list of Utah Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: Utah State Office of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools UT State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2008 46.78 77th 142 45.8%
2009 51.98 64th 148 56.8%
2010 42.50 92nd 153 39.9%
2011 37.95 111th 164 32.3%
2012 36.11 116th 166 30.1%
2013 20.06 140th 167 16.2%
See the entire list of Utah Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: Utah State Office of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Con Amore School Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 











Data source: Utah State Office of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Con Amore School.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Con Amore School, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 38 0 0 0 3 n/a n/a 0 41
1989 31 0 0 0 4 n/a n/a 2 37
1990 60 0 0 0 4 n/a n/a 0 64
1991 36 0 0 0 2 n/a n/a 0 38
1992 68 0 0 1 2 n/a n/a 0 71
1993 39 0 0 1 0 n/a n/a 0 40
1994 26 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 26
1995 24 0 0 2 2 n/a n/a 0 28
1996 24 0 0 2 2 n/a n/a 0 28
1997 56 0 0 3 2 n/a n/a 0 61
1998 26 0 0 4 3 n/a n/a 0 33
1999 32 0 0 1 1 n/a n/a 0 34
2000 32 0 0 2 2 n/a n/a 0 36
2001 82 0 0 1 4 n/a n/a 0 87
2002 35 0 0 1 4 n/a n/a 0 40
2003 35 0 0 1 4 n/a n/a 0 40
2004 28 0 0 2 1 n/a n/a 0 31
2005 28 0 0 2 3 n/a n/a 0 33
2006 95 0 0 12 10 n/a n/a 0 117
2007 88 1 1 8 9 n/a n/a 0 107
2008 101 1 0 15 9 n/a n/a 0 126
2009 124 2 0 13 7 n/a n/a 0 146
2010 81 2 0 10 8 n/a n/a 35 136
2011 122 3 0 13 10 0 2 0 150
2012 102 2 0 16 7 0 0 0 127
2013 117 1 0 14 6 0 2 0 140
2014 109 1 0 17 6 0 1 0 134
2015 142 0 1 20 10 0 3 0 176
2016 79 1 2 7 6 0 3 0 98
2017 69 2 2 8 8 0 5 0 94
2018 69 1 1 9 8 0 5 0 93
2019 82 1 1 10 8 1 3 0 106
2020 86 1 0 8 7 0 4 0 106
2021 71 1 0 10 6 0 6 0 94
2022 68 1 0 17 4 0 6 0 96
2023 46 0 0 12 4 0 6 0 68

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 41 4.0 10.2 n/a
1989 37 4.0 9.2 n/a
1990 64 6.0 10.6 42.2
1991 38 5.0 7.6 73.7
1992 71 7.0 10.1 57.7
1993 40 9.0 4.4 67.5
1994 26 4.0 6.5 69.2
1995 28 6.0 4.7 57.1
1996 28 6.0 4.7 57.1
1997 61 6.0 10.2 37.7
1998 33 5.0 6.6 57.6
1999 34 5.0 6.8 64.7
2000 36 4.5 8.0 55.6
2001 87 4.0 21.8 52.9
2002 40 3.3 12.1 92.5
2003 40 3.3 12.1 92.5
2004 31 3.5 8.9 54.8
2005 33 4.3 7.7 90.9
2006 117 6.0 19.5 64.1
2007 107 6.5 16.5 0
2008 126 6.0 21.0 50
2009 146 32.0 23.4 49.3
2010 136 7.0 19.4 83.2
2011 150 9.0 16.6 46.7
2012 127 8.0 15.7 47.2
2013 140 8.0 17.5 50
2014 134 7.0 19.1 43.3
2015 176 n/a n/a 39.8
2016 98 n/a n/a 59.2
2017 94 7.0 13.4 68.1
2018 93 n/a n/a 58.1
2019 106 5.8 18.2 47.2
2020 106 5.0 21.2 65.1
2021 94 n/a n/a 67
2022 96 6.0 16.0 52.1
2023 68 4.0 17.0 64.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Con Amore School

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 41 4.0 10.2 n/a
1989 37 4.0 9.2 n/a
1990 64 6.0 10.6 42.2
1991 38 5.0 7.6 73.7
1992 71 7.0 10.1 57.7
1993 40 9.0 4.4 67.5
1994 26 4.0 6.5 69.2
1995 28 6.0 4.7 57.1
1996 28 6.0 4.7 57.1
1997 61 6.0 10.2 37.7
1998 33 5.0 6.6 57.6
1999 34 5.0 6.8 64.7
2000 36 4.5 8.0 55.6
2001 87 4.0 21.8 52.9
2002 40 3.3 12.1 92.5
2003 40 3.3 12.1 92.5
2004 31 3.5 8.9 54.8
2005 33 4.3 7.7 90.9
2006 117 6.0 19.5 64.1
2007 107 6.5 16.5 0
2008 126 6.0 21.0 50
2009 146 32.0 23.4 49.3
2010 136 7.0 19.4 83.2
2011 150 9.0 16.6 46.7
2012 127 8.0 15.7 47.2
2013 140 8.0 17.5 50
2014 134 7.0 19.1 43.3
2015 176 n/a n/a 39.8
2016 98 n/a n/a 59.2
2017 94 7.0 13.4 68.1
2018 93 n/a n/a 58.1
2019 106 5.8 18.2 47.2
2020 106 5.0 21.2 65.1
2021 94 n/a n/a 67
2022 96 6.0 16.0 52.1
2023 68 4.0 17.0 64.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Con Amore School

Help

YearExpenditures from Federal FundsExpenditures from State and Local FundsTotal Expenditures Per Pupil (All Funds)
2019 $5,016 (12.8%) $34,213 (87.2%) $39,228

Data source: Utah Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Con Amore School

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students10668
 35.8%
African American10
 100%
American Indian84
 50%
Asian10
 100%
Hispanic1012
 20%
Pacific Islander10
 100%
White8246
 43.9%
Two or More Races36
 100%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients47.2%64.7%
 17.5%


Schools Near Con Amore School









Frequently Asked Questions about Con Amore School

In the 2022-23 school year, 68 students attended Con Amore School.

Students at Con Amore School are 68% White, 18% Hispanic, 9% Two or more races, 6% American Indian.


Rate Con Amore School!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Con Amore School!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Utah State Board of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 24 milliseconds.