Is Chisholm Secondary a good school?

Chisholm Secondary ranks 287 th of 480 Minnesota high schools. SchoolDigger rates this school 2 stars out of 5.

How many students attend Chisholm Secondary?

In the 2022-23 school year, 334 students attended Chisholm Secondary.

What is the racial makeup of Chisholm Secondary?

Students at Chisholm Secondary are 90% White, 4% Two or more races, 3% American Indian, 2% African American, 1% Hispanic.

What schools feed into Chisholm Secondary?

Chisholm Secondary is fed by the following schools: Elementary : Vaughan-Steffensrud Elementary Middle : Chisholm Elementary

Chisholm Secondary

Summary:

Chisholm Secondary is a public high school serving grades 7-12 in the small town of Chisholm, Minnesota, with a student population of 334. The school's performance has been somewhat inconsistent, with fluctuating statewide rankings and academic metrics that generally lag behind state and district averages.

Chisholm Secondary's statewide ranking has ranged from 217 out of 492 Minnesota high schools in 2018-2019 to 336 out of 476 in 2022-2023, and its School Digger rating has varied between 1 and 3 stars out of 5 over the years. The school performs better for male students (ranked 187 out of 405 in 2023-2024) compared to female students (ranked 326 out of 403), and its rankings for White students (307 out of 402) and special education students (194 out of 214) are relatively low. Chisholm Secondary's four-year graduation rate has ranged from 77.0% to 90.2%, with a notable dip in 2020-2021, and its dropout rate has fluctuated from 2.4% to 10.4% over the past few years.

When compared to nearby schools, Northland Learning Center 010 and East Range Academy of Technical-Science have significantly lower test scores and rankings than Chisholm Secondary, while Mountain Iron-Buhl Secondary and Hibbing High perform better on various metrics. Chisholm Secondary's challenges may be influenced by its relatively high percentage of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, as well as potential racial achievement gaps that warrant further investigation.

Detail:

Public 7-12

301 4th St SW
Chisholm, MN 55719-1900

(218) 254-5726

District: Chisholm Public School District

SchoolDigger Rank:
287^th of 480 Minnesota High Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures: $14,250

Feeder schools for Chisholm Secondary:

Elementary:	Vaughan-Steffensrud Elementary
Middle:	Chisholm Elementary

Student/teacher ratio: 15.9

Number of students: 334

Racial breakdown:

White:

90.4%

Two or more races:

3.6%

American Indian:

2.7%

Free/discounted lunch recipients: 43.1%

See top rated Minnesota high schools

Compare Chisholm Secondary to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends

Compare Details Chisholm Secondary ranks worse than 78.3% of middle schools in Minnesota. (See more...)

Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 25.95. (See more...)

Compare Details Chisholm Secondary ranks worse than 59.8% of high schools in Minnesota. (See more...)

Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 45.02. (See more...)

The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) measures the percentage of Chisholm Secondary freshmen who graduate within four years, adjusting for students who transfer in or out.

The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.

Student Body

Compare Details Racial makeup is: White (90.4%), two or more races (3.6%), American Indian (2.7%). (See more...)

Compare Details 43.1% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)

Teachers

Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Chisholm Secondary is 15.9. (See more...)

Compare Chisholm Secondary employs 20.9 full-time teachers.

Finance

Compare Details The average total spent per student at Chisholm Secondary is $14,250.

Schooldigger 2024 Rankings:

Chisholm Secondary:

SchoolDigger ranks Chisholm Secondary 427^th of 545 Minnesota public middle schools. (See Chisholm Secondary in the ranking list.)

Middle School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:

Low Socio Economic Status students:

Female students:

Male students:

White students:

SchoolDigger ranks Chisholm Secondary 287^th of 480 Minnesota public high schools. (See Chisholm Secondary in the ranking list.)

High School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:

Low Socio Economic Status students:

Female students:

Male students:

White students:

What do you think?

Your rating for Chisholm Secondary?

(Ranking FAQ)

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Compare

Rank History for all middle school students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile
2004	34.08	309^th	387	20.2%
2005	33.57	316^th	396	20.2%
2006	46.01	268^th	406	34.0%
2007	31.56	329^th	403	18.4%
2008	31.13	336^th	409	17.8%
2010	40.45	321^st	454	29.3%
2011	32.82	370^th	478	22.6%
2012	25.08	395^th	469	15.8%
2013	33.04	363^rd	488	25.6%
2014	20.38	415^th	490	15.3%
2015	36.49	354^th	516	31.4%
2016	34.50	366^th	508	28.0%
2017	43.72	321^st	523	38.6%
2018	32.82	376^th	518	27.4%
2019	32.33	386^th	533	27.6%
2021	40.81	313^th	521	39.9%
2022	25.15	400^th	520	23.1%
2023	24.04	416^th	529	21.4%
2024	25.95	427^th	545	21.7%

See the entire list of Minnesota High School Rankings!

Rank History for middle school Special Education students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile	SchoolDigger Rating
2019	24.73	230^th	282	18.4%
2023	25.51	241^st	298	19.1%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Special Education Students!

Rank History for middle school Low Socio Economic Status students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	42.41	258^th	401	35.7%
2019	42.48	257^th	415	38.1%
2021	57.90	134^th	399	66.4%
2022	28.31	314^th	404	22.3%
2023	25.39	358^th	459	22.0%
2024	35.29	324^th	473	31.5%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for middle school Female students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	36.35	310^th	436	28.9%
2019	19.06	380^th	439	13.4%
2021	21.61	370^th	443	16.5%
2022	16.64	400^th	467	14.3%
2023	17.22	392^nd	455	13.8%
2024	19.89	400^th	474	15.6%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for middle school Male students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	25.23	355^th	438	18.9%
2019	42.50	281^st	454	38.1%
2021	56.09	181^st	437	58.6%
2022	32.33	335^th	476	29.6%
2023	31.56	322^nd	464	30.6%
2024	31.25	345^th	479	28.0%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for middle school White students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked Middle Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	16.62	383^rd	428	10.5%
2019	14.60	398^th	428	7.0%
2021	26.49	333^rd	422	21.1%
2022	10.80	417^th	438	4.8%
2023	9.63	419^th	436	3.9%
2024	13.87	409^th	440	7.0%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Compare

Rank History for all high school students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile
2004	68.02	188^th	433	56.6%
2005	59.08	280^th	452	38.1%
2006	61.18	218^th	450	51.6%
2007	66.05	182^nd	463	60.7%
2008	70.53	162^nd	460	64.8%
2010	49.95	336^th	540	37.8%
2011	62.31	249^th	545	54.3%
2012	53.61	321^st	539	40.4%
2013	57.45	273^rd	534	48.9%
2014	39.17	340^th	483	29.6%
2015	61.91	217^th	504	56.9%
2016	25.84	374^th	489	23.5%
2017	33.03	359^th	489	26.6%
2018	54.31	268^th	494	45.7%
2019	60.72	217^th	492	55.9%
2021	33.77	321^st	428	25.0%
2022	41.08	307^th	472	35.0%
2023	34.96	336^th	476	29.4%
2024	45.02	287^th	480	40.2%

See the entire list of Minnesota High School Rankings!

Rank History for high school Special Education students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile	SchoolDigger Rating
2022	18.30	194^th	214	9.3%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Special Education Students!

Rank History for high school Low Socio Economic Status students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	71.71	83^rd	374	77.8%
2019	58.44	151^st	370	59.2%
2021	45.22	154^th	270	43.0%
2022	53.73	142^nd	312	54.5%
2023	44.31	227^th	393	42.2%
2024	53.25	187^th	389	51.9%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for high school Female students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	36.59	293^rd	395	25.8%
2019	35.00	295^th	401	26.4%
2021	38.25	241^st	339	28.9%
2022	24.76	319^th	388	17.8%
2023	14.48	357^th	396	9.8%
2024	22.37	326^th	403	19.1%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for high school Male students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	59.97	177^th	398	55.5%
2019	74.77	76^th	411	81.5%
2021	18.04	311^th	351	11.4%
2022	47.49	227^th	403	43.7%
2023	44.17	239^th	398	39.9%
2024	55.77	187^th	405	53.8%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for high school White students at Chisholm Secondary

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	MN State Percentile
2018	39.83	298^th	414	28.0%
2019	55.26	204^th	412	50.5%
2021	21.88	323^rd	364	11.3%
2022	25.62	334^th	401	16.7%
2023	24.81	333^rd	398	16.3%
2024	31.83	307^th	402	23.6%

See the entire list of Best Minnesota High Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Data source: Minnesota Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Chisholm Secondary.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Chisholm Secondary, submit a rating!

Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!

Enrollment information for Chisholm Secondary

Compare

Year	White	African American	Asian	Hispanic	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Not Specified	Total
1988	355	3	1	0	11	n/a	n/a	0	370
1989	336	1	2	1	13	n/a	n/a	0	353
1990	300	0	4	0	8	n/a	n/a	0	312
1991	318	0	4	0	4	n/a	n/a	0	326
1993	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	342	342
1994	330	1	6	0	9	n/a	n/a	0	346
1995	318	1	5	0	6	n/a	n/a	0	330
1996	318	1	5	0	6	n/a	n/a	0	330
1997	317	2	3	0	7	n/a	n/a	0	329
1998	333	1	2	0	6	n/a	n/a	0	342
1999	360	1	1	1	5	n/a	n/a	0	368
2000	338	0	4	2	5	n/a	n/a	0	349
2001	445	0	6	1	8	n/a	n/a	0	460
2002	369	0	5	1	8	n/a	n/a	0	383
2003	369	0	5	1	8	n/a	n/a	0	383
2004	343	0	3	0	12	n/a	n/a	0	358
2005	340	0	4	1	10	n/a	n/a	0	355
2006	331	0	3	0	10	n/a	n/a	0	344
2007	317	1	3	0	7	n/a	n/a	0	328
2008	319	2	4	0	7	n/a	n/a	0	332
2009	309	4	3	0	7	n/a	n/a	0	323
2010	291	4	4	1	6	n/a	n/a	0	306
2011	265	3	1	3	6	1	0	0	279
2012	272	4	1	1	3	1	0	0	282
2013	291	3	1	2	4	1	3	0	305
2014	274	3	1	3	6	2	7	0	296
2015	298	4	1	3	6	0	7	0	319
2016	307	4	1	3	3	1	10	0	329
2017	309	6	2	5	5	0	17	0	344
2018	294	6	2	8	7	0	15	0	332
2019	285	6	0	5	7	0	15	0	318
2020	298	9	2	5	9	2	9	0	334
2021	302	8	0	4	8	0	9	0	331
2022	308	6	1	4	12	0	11	0	342
2023	302	7	0	4	9	0	12	0	334

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Chisholm Secondary

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1988	370	21.9	16.8	14.6
1989	353	19.9	17.7	13.3
1990	312	16.6	18.7	9.3
1991	326	21.0	15.5	7.7
1993	342	0.0	0.0	0
1994	346	14.4	24.0	11
1995	330	15.8	20.9	6.1
1996	330	15.8	20.9	6.1
1997	329	13.4	24.6	7.3
1998	342	n/a	0.0	7.6
1999	368	18.3	20.1	11.7
2000	349	11.8	29.6	10.6
2001	460	12.6	36.5	15
2002	383	21.4	17.9	18
2003	383	21.4	17.9	18
2004	358	20.1	17.8	22.3
2005	355	19.6	18.1	25.9
2006	344	19.6	17.6	27.3
2007	328	19.8	16.6	29.6
2008	332	20.5	16.2	34.9
2009	323	20.5	15.8	33.1
2010	306	20.9	14.6	36.6
2011	279	18.7	14.8	34.4
2012	282	19.4	14.4	31.2
2013	305	20.8	14.6	35.7
2014	296	20.8	14.2	32.4
2015	319	23.0	13.8	38.6
2016	329	24.0	13.7	45
2017	344	23.8	14.4	43.6
2018	332	22.7	14.5	47.9
2019	318	23.0	13.7	38.1
2020	334	23.2	14.3	35
2021	331	18.9	17.4	31.4
2022	342	19.6	17.4	38
2023	334	20.9	15.9	43.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Chisholm Secondary

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1988	370	21.9	16.8	14.6
1989	353	19.9	17.7	13.3
1990	312	16.6	18.7	9.3
1991	326	21.0	15.5	7.7
1993	342	0.0	0.0	0
1994	346	14.4	24.0	11
1995	330	15.8	20.9	6.1
1996	330	15.8	20.9	6.1
1997	329	13.4	24.6	7.3
1998	342	n/a	0.0	7.6
1999	368	18.3	20.1	11.7
2000	349	11.8	29.6	10.6
2001	460	12.6	36.5	15
2002	383	21.4	17.9	18
2003	383	21.4	17.9	18
2004	358	20.1	17.8	22.3
2005	355	19.6	18.1	25.9
2006	344	19.6	17.6	27.3
2007	328	19.8	16.6	29.6
2008	332	20.5	16.2	34.9
2009	323	20.5	15.8	33.1
2010	306	20.9	14.6	36.6
2011	279	18.7	14.8	34.4
2012	282	19.4	14.4	31.2
2013	305	20.8	14.6	35.7
2014	296	20.8	14.2	32.4
2015	319	23.0	13.8	38.6
2016	329	24.0	13.7	45
2017	344	23.8	14.4	43.6
2018	332	22.7	14.5	47.9
2019	318	23.0	13.7	38.1
2020	334	23.2	14.3	35
2021	331	18.9	17.4	31.4
2022	342	19.6	17.4	38
2023	334	20.9	15.9	43.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.

Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Chisholm Secondary

Year	Total Expenditures Per Pupil
2019	$14,250

Data source: Minnesota Department of Education

Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Chisholm Secondary

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)	Rank Post pandemic (2022-2023)	Change (%)
Ranks 386^th of 533 Middle schools	Ranks 416^th of 529 Middle schools	6.2%
Ranks 217^th of 492 High schools	Ranks 336^th of 476 High schools	26.5%

Test Scores

	% proficient Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)	% proficient Post pandemic (2022-2023)	Change (%)
7th Grade Math (Chisholm Secondary)	36.7	21.1	15.6%
7th Grade Math (Chisholm Public School District)	36.7	21.1	15.6%
7th Grade Math (Minnesota)	52.1	39.7	12.4%
7th Grade Reading (Chisholm Secondary)	51.6	22.5	29.1%
7th Grade Reading (Chisholm Public School District)	51.6	22.5	29.1%
7th Grade Reading (Minnesota)	57.5	45.2	12.3%
8th Grade Math (Chisholm Secondary)	42.3	22.5	19.8%
8th Grade Math (Chisholm Public School District)	42.3	22.5	19.8%
8th Grade Math (Minnesota)	55.2	40.3	14.9%
8th Grade Reading (Chisholm Secondary)	44.2	30.6	13.7%
8th Grade Reading (Chisholm Public School District)	44.2	30.6	13.7%
8th Grade Reading (Minnesota)	57.7	44.8	12.9%
8th Grade Science (Chisholm Secondary)	13.7	12.7	1%
8th Grade Science (Chisholm Public School District)	13.7	12.7	1%
8th Grade Science (Minnesota)	43	27.6	15.4%
10th Grade Reading (Chisholm Secondary)	70.2	42.3	27.9%
10th Grade Reading (Chisholm Public School District)	70.2	42.3	27.9%
10th Grade Reading (Minnesota)	60.4	51.7	8.7%
11th Grade Math (Chisholm Secondary)	11.4	12.8	1.4%
11th Grade Math (Chisholm Public School District)	11.4	12.8	1.4%
11th Grade Math (Minnesota)	45	36	9%
End of Course Science (Chisholm Secondary)	62.3	31.4	30.9%
End of Course Science (Chisholm Public School District)	62.3	31.4	30.9%
End of Course Science (Minnesota)	54.4	41.8	12.5%

Student Body

	Number of students Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)	Number of students Post pandemic (2022-2023)	Change (%)
Total Students	318	334	5%
African American	6	7	16.7%
American Indian	7	9	28.6%
Asian	0	0
Hispanic	5	4	20%
Pacific Islander	0	0
White	285	302	6%
Two or More Races	15	12	20%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	38.1%	43.1%	5.1%

Schools Near Chisholm Secondary

Choose columns to see: Summary School Students/Teachers Ranking Test Scores Finance All

School													Students/Teachers											Ranking (2024)				Ranking (2023)				MCA-III Math (2024)				MCA-III Reading (2024)				MCA-III Science (2024)			Per Pupil Expenditures (2019)
Name	Type	Grades	Address	City	Zip	County	District	Is Charter	Is Magnet	Is Virtual	Is Title I	Phone	Enrollment	Full-time Teachers	Student/ Teacher Ratio	Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Average Standard Score (2024)	Statewide Rank (2024)	State Percentile (2024)	SchoolDigger Rating (2024)	Average Standard Score (2023)	Statewide Rank (2023)	State Percentile (2023)	Rank Change from Previous Year	MCA-III Math 7th Grade	MCA-III Math 8th Grade	MCA-III Math 11th Grade	MCA-III Math All Grades	MCA-III Reading 7th Grade	MCA-III Reading 8th Grade	MCA-III Reading 10th Grade	MCA-III Reading All Grades	MCA-III Science 8th Grade	MCA-III Science End of Course	MCA-III Science All Grades	Total
Chisholm Secondary	Public	7-12	301 4th St SW	Chisholm	55719	St. Louis County	Chisholm Public School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 254-5726	334	21	15.9	43.1%	302 (90.4%)	7 (2.1%)	4 (1.2%)	0 (0.0%)	9 (2.7%)	0 (0.0%)	12 (3.6%)	45	287^th of 480 public high schools	40.2%		35	336^th of 476 public high schools	29.4%	49	26.7	16.7	19.1	21.1	33.3	25.0	44.9	35.4	13.9	38.0	27.9	$14,250
Hibbing High	Public	7-12	800 E 21st St	Hibbing	55746	St. Louis County	Hibbing Public School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 208-0841	993	48	20.7	37.1%	859 (86.5%)	19 (1.9%)	28 (2.8%)	8 (0.8%)	11 (1.1%)	2 (0.2%)	66 (6.6%)	61.3	200^th of 480 public high schools	58.3%		67.8	143^rd of 476 public high schools	70.0%	57	43.2	36.3	26.8	36.3	48.9	39.1	58.5	48.4	38.5	39.2	38.8	$15,553
Mesabi Area Learning Center	Public	9-12	800 E 21st St	Hibbing	55746	St. Louis County	Hibbing Public School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 208-0841	22	0		63.6%	17 (77.3%)	1 (4.5%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	2 (9.1%)	0 (0.0%)	2 (9.1%)								(n/a)												$8,362
Cherry Secondary	Public	7-12	3943 Tamminen Rd	Iron	55751	St. Louis County	St. Louis County School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 258-8991	250	20	12.2	42.4%	213 (85.2%)	1 (0.4%)	5 (2.0%)	0 (0.0%)	9 (3.6%)	0 (0.0%)	22 (8.8%)	40.1	314^th of 480 public high schools	34.6%		57.9	208^th of 476 public high schools	56.3%	106	14.3	32.5	25.5	23.1	44.6	37.5	38.3	40.6	22.5	32.6	27.9	$17,767
Mountain Iron-Buhl Secondary	Public	7-12	8659 Unity Drive	Mountain Iron	55768	St. Louis County	Mountain Iron-Buhl School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 735-8271	268	15	17.6	48.9%	220 (82.1%)	3 (1.1%)	13 (4.9%)	1 (0.4%)	11 (4.1%)	0 (0.0%)	20 (7.5%)	51.3	249^th of 480 public high schools	48.1%		72.8	109^th of 476 public high schools	77.1%	140	40.5	45.7	27.0	38.4	52.4	56.5	44.1	51.6	37.0	40.6	38.5	$15,739
Northeast Service Cooperative Oll	Public, Virtual	7-12	5525 Emerald Ave	Mountain Iron	55768	St. Louis County	Region 3 - Northeast Service County-op	No	No	Yes	No	(218) 741-0750	0	1	.0		0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()								(n/a)
East Range Academy Of Technical-Science	Public, Charter	9-12	8541 Park Ridge Dr	Mountain Iron	55768	St. Louis County	East Range Academy Of Technical-Science	Yes	No	No	Yes	(218) 744-7965	161	8	20.6	77.6%	127 (78.9%)	8 (5.0%)	5 (3.1%)	0 (0.0%)	19 (11.8%)	0 (0.0%)	2 (1.2%)	17.4	404^th of 480 public high schools	15.8%		11.9	419^th of 476 public high schools	12.0%	15			0.0	0.0			39.3	39.3		16.0	16.0	$15,983
Nashwauk-Keewatin Alp	Public	9-12	400 2nd St	Nashwauk	55769	Itasca County	Nashwauk-Keewatin School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 885-1280	0	1	1.7		0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()								(n/a)												$16,753
Nashwauk Secondary	Public	7-12	400 2nd St	Nashwauk	55769	Itasca County	Nashwauk-Keewatin School District	No	No	No	No	(218) 885-1280	249	17	14.9	55.4%	217 (87.1%)	2 (0.8%)	5 (2.0%)	2 (0.8%)	2 (0.8%)	0 (0.0%)	21 (8.4%)	34.6	337^th of 480 public high schools	29.8%		47.2	266^th of 476 public high schools	44.1%	71	34.4	56.1	18.5	39.0	50.0	31.7	37.8	39.1	24.4	32.4	28.0	$15,831
Northland Learning Center 010	Public	7-12	1201 S 13th Ave	Virginia	55792	St. Louis County	Northland Learning Center	No	No	No	No	(218) 741-9201	44	3	14.2	70.5%	34 (77.3%)	1 (2.3%)	1 (2.3%)	1 (2.3%)	3 (6.8%)	0 (0.0%)	4 (9.1%)								(n/a)			9.1	9.1

Chisholm Secondary

Chisholm Secondary:

Middle School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:

High School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:

What do you think?

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for all middle school students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for middle school Special Education students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for middle school Low Socio Economic Status students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for middle school Female students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for middle school Male students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for middle school White students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for all high school students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for high school Special Education students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for high school Low Socio Economic Status students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for high school Female students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for high school Male students at Chisholm Secondary

Rank History for high school White students at Chisholm Secondary

Enrollment information for Chisholm Secondary

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Chisholm Secondary

Student/Teacher Ratio Chisholm Secondary

Per Pupil Expenditures for Chisholm Secondary

Impact of COVID-19 on Chisholm Secondary

Rankings

Test Scores

Student Body

Schools Near Chisholm Secondary

Frequently Asked Questions about Chisholm Secondary

Rate Chisholm Secondary!

Other helpful SchoolDigger resources...

Sign up for updates!