Rank History for Charles J Caruso Middle School
Compare
Rank History for all students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2003 |
92.06 |
45th |
1185 |
96.2% |
|
2004 |
91.96 |
31st |
1204 |
97.4% |
|
2005 |
88.40 |
75th |
1209 |
93.8% |
|
2006 |
90.03 |
31st |
1272 |
97.6% |
|
2007 |
89.95 |
24th |
1287 |
98.1% |
|
2008 |
89.23 |
31st |
1293 |
97.6% |
|
2009 |
88.05 |
42nd |
1318 |
96.8% |
|
2010 |
87.55 |
49th |
1327 |
96.3% |
|
2011 |
87.01 |
56th |
1344 |
95.8% |
|
2012 |
86.10 |
84th |
1365 |
93.8% |
|
2013 |
92.07 |
56th |
1367 |
95.9% |
|
2014 |
92.01 |
51st |
1322 |
96.1% |
|
2015 |
93.65 |
69th |
1302 |
94.7% |
|
2016 |
97.45 |
22nd |
1294 |
98.3% |
|
2017 |
96.85 |
34th |
1293 |
97.4% |
|
2018 |
96.39 |
34th |
1293 |
97.4% |
|
2019 |
96.77 |
32nd |
1356 |
97.6% |
|
2021 |
98.23 |
25th |
1241 |
98.0% |
|
2022 |
91.85 |
94th |
1369 |
93.1% |
|
2023 |
93.98 |
59th |
1367 |
95.7% |
|
2024 |
96.71 |
34th |
1363 |
97.5% |
|
See the entire list of
Illinois Middle School Rankings!
Rank History for Special Education students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
94.14 |
15th |
602 |
97.5% |
|
2019 |
95.59 |
21st |
792 |
97.3% |
|
2021 |
93.57 |
19th |
548 |
96.5% |
|
2022 |
71.45 |
92nd |
781 |
88.2% |
|
2023 |
97.92 |
20th |
805 |
97.5% |
|
2024 |
97.69 |
20th |
802 |
97.5% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for Special Education Students!
Rank History for Female students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
96.18 |
30th |
1226 |
97.6% |
|
2019 |
94.81 |
32nd |
1276 |
97.5% |
|
2021 |
96.78 |
24th |
1017 |
97.6% |
|
2022 |
90.37 |
99th |
1286 |
92.3% |
|
2023 |
93.48 |
60th |
1275 |
95.3% |
|
2024 |
95.24 |
37th |
1251 |
97.0% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for Female Students!
Rank History for Disabled students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2023 |
93.83 |
14th |
674 |
97.9% |
|
2024 |
95.99 |
15th |
639 |
97.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for Disabled Students!
Rank History for Male students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
95.99 |
31st |
1223 |
97.5% |
|
2019 |
97.53 |
22nd |
1296 |
98.3% |
|
2021 |
98.10 |
19th |
1048 |
98.2% |
|
2022 |
92.23 |
74th |
1286 |
94.2% |
|
2023 |
92.55 |
68th |
1292 |
94.7% |
|
2024 |
96.84 |
31st |
1264 |
97.5% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for Male Students!
Rank History for Asian students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
85.46 |
16th |
209 |
92.3% |
|
2019 |
88.52 |
9th |
201 |
95.5% |
|
2021 |
89.61 |
3rd |
112 |
97.3% |
|
2022 |
86.05 |
18th |
198 |
90.9% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for Asian Students!
Rank History for White students at Charles J Caruso Middle School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
IL State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
90.99 |
45th |
889 |
94.9% |
|
2019 |
91.13 |
40th |
905 |
95.6% |
|
2021 |
94.40 |
22nd |
813 |
97.3% |
|
2022 |
79.93 |
115th |
898 |
87.2% |
|
2023 |
85.70 |
85th |
895 |
90.5% |
|
2024 |
91.57 |
42nd |
875 |
95.2% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Illinois Middle Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: Illinois State Board of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.