Prospect High (Continuation)

Summary:

Prospect High (Continuation) is a small public high school in Pleasant Hill, California, serving grades 9-12 and part of the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. With just 66 students, the school consistently ranks among the lowest-performing high schools in the state, receiving 0 or 1-star ratings from SchoolDigger and struggling with low academic performance, particularly for male, Hispanic, and low-income students.

Prospect High (Continuation)'s graduation rates have fluctuated between 67.8% and 83.3% in recent years, and its dropout rates have been high, ranging from 7.3% to 20.3%. The school also faces extremely high chronic absenteeism, reaching up to 90.5% in the 2022-2023 school year. Standardized test scores at Prospect High (Continuation) are well below state and district averages, with some subjects seeing 0% of students meeting proficiency standards.

In comparison, other high schools in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, such as College Park High and Ygnacio Valley High, have much higher academic performance, graduation rates, and lower chronic absenteeism. As a continuation high school, Prospect High (Continuation) likely serves a population of students who have struggled in traditional settings, which may contribute to the school's challenges. Targeted interventions and support services may be necessary to help these students succeed.


Detail:

Public 9-12

 One Santa Barbara Rd.
       Pleasant Hill, CA  94523-4417


(925) 682-8000

District: Mt. Diablo Unified

SchoolDigger Rank:
2031st of 2,323 California High Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $17,690 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  9.8 Help
Number of students:  75

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:
66.7%
White:
24.0%
Pacific Islander:
2.7%
more

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  38.7% Help


 See top rated California high schools

 Compare Prospect High (Continuation) to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Prospect High (Continuation) ranks worse than 87.4% of high schools in California. It also ranks 6th among 7 ranked high schools in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 9.85. (See more...)
Help
The four-year cohort graduation rate measures the percentage of students at Prospect High (Continuation) who earn a standard high school diploma within four years of starting ninth grade.
Help
The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Racial makeup is: Hispanic (66.7%), White (24%), Pacific Islander (2.7%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 38.7% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Prospect High (Continuation) is 9.8, which is the 2nd best among 7 high schools in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Prospect High (Continuation) employs 7.6 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Prospect High (Continuation) is $17,690, which is the 4th highest among 7 high schools in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District.
Schooldigger 2024 Rankings:

Prospect High (Continuation):

SchoolDigger ranks Prospect High (Continuation) 2031st of 2323 California public high schools. (See Prospect High (Continuation) in the ranking list.)

High School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:


Male students:
Hispanic students:


Mt. Diablo Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Mt. Diablo Unified 789th of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Prospect High (Continuation)?

Rank History for Prospect High (Continuation)

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Prospect High (Continuation)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 23.61 1123rd 1653 32.1%
2005 18.40 1451st 1901 23.7%
2006 7.83 1797th 1968 8.7%
2007 19.14 1539th 2063 25.4%
2008 28.33 1222nd 2117 42.3%
2009 26.04 1576th 2238 29.6%
2010 47.73 821st 2281 64.0%
2011 11.35 1996th 2367 15.7%
2012 24.71 1450th 2354 38.4%
2013 14.94 1885th 2426 22.3%
2015 24.95 1426th 1994 28.5%
2016 8.45 1986th 2039 2.6%
2017 12.30 1694th 2021 16.2%
2018 16.10 1579th 2017 21.7%
2019 11.13 1970th 2133 7.6%
2021 12.70 1114th 1290 13.6%
2022 9.47 2082nd 2123 1.9%
2023 7.61 2227th 2348 5.2%
2024 9.85 2031st 2323 12.6%
See the entire list of California High School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Prospect High (Continuation)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2022 8.74 1942nd 1943 0.1%
2023 9.51 2029th 2247 9.7%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Male students at Prospect High (Continuation)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 17.34 1413th 1834 23.0%
2019 10.60 1751st 1880 6.9%
2022 9.77 1859th 1916 3.0%
2023 9.10 1998th 2207 9.5%
2024 9.78 1902nd 2172 12.4%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for Hispanic students at Prospect High (Continuation)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 8.71 1684th 1742 3.3%
2022 8.30 1860th 1861 0.1%
2023 6.24 2094th 2142 2.2%
2024 10.85 1820th 2125 14.4%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Hispanic Students!

Rank History for White students at Prospect High (Continuation)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 7.84 1060th 1173 9.6%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Prospect High (Continuation) Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 





Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Prospect High (Continuation).

If you have first-hand knowledge about Prospect High (Continuation), submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Prospect High (Continuation)

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1992 22 4 0 4 1 n/a n/a 0 31
1993 29 2 1 3 0 n/a n/a 0 35
1994 36 1 0 1 0 n/a n/a 0 38
1995 31 0 1 8 0 n/a n/a 0 40
1996 31 0 1 8 0 n/a n/a 0 40
1997 39 1 2 0 0 n/a n/a 0 42
1998 29 3 1 5 0 n/a n/a 0 38
1999 34 0 1 4 0 n/a n/a 0 39
2000 33 0 2 5 0 n/a n/a 0 40
2001 34 0 1 2 0 n/a n/a 0 37
2002 30 2 1 4 0 n/a n/a 0 37
2003 30 2 1 4 0 n/a n/a 0 37
2004 35 2 1 10 0 n/a n/a 0 48
2005 35 2 2 8 1 n/a n/a 0 48
2006 37 3 2 7 1 n/a n/a 0 50
2007 32 2 3 12 1 n/a n/a 0 50
2008 29 4 4 7 n/a n/a n/a 0 44
2009 36 4 1 7 0 0 2 0 50
2010 32 2 2 9 0 1 1 0 47
2011 25 2 2 16 1 0 1 0 47
2012 21 3 2 19 0 0 1 0 46
2013 25 1 3 19 1 0 2 0 51
2014 16 1 3 16 0 0 0 0 36
2015 11 1 0 13 0 0 1 0 26
2016 24 4 0 20 0 0 0 0 48
2017 16 2 2 25 0 0 1 0 46
2018 27 1 0 21 2 0 2 0 53
2019 23 2 2 23 1 0 3 0 54
2020 24 0 2 20 0 0 5 0 51
2021 16 2 4 17 1 1 4 1 46
2022 7 3 4 36 0 1 7 0 58
2023 12 3 5 39 0 0 6 1 66
2024 18 1 1 50 0 2 2 1 75

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Prospect High (Continuation)

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1992 31 n/a n/a 9.7
1993 35 2.0 17.5 0
1994 38 2.0 19.0 0
1995 40 2.0 20.0 7.5
1996 40 2.0 20.0 7.5
1997 42 2.0 21.0 0
1998 38 2.0 19.0 10.5
1999 39 2.0 19.5 0
2000 40 2.0 20.0 0
2001 37 1.0 37.0 0
2002 37 3.0 12.3 10.8
2003 37 3.0 12.3 10.8
2004 48 2.0 24.0 12.5
2005 48 2.0 24.0 10.4
2006 50 2.0 25.0 0
2007 50 2.0 25.0 22
2008 44 3.0 14.7 36.4
2009 50 2.0 16.7 0
2010 47 2.0 23.5 6.4
2011 47 n/a n/a 10.6
2012 46 2.0 23.0 n/a
2013 51 2.0 25.5 52.9
2014 36 2.0 18.0 44.4
2015 26 2.0 13.0 46.2
2016 48 2.0 24.0 62.5
2017 46 2.5 18.1 58.7
2018 53 2.2 24.0 45.3
2019 54 2.0 27.0 40.7
2020 51 n/a n/a 39.2
2021 46 3.5 12.8 43.5
2022 58 4.7 12.3 39.7
2023 66 4.9 13.3 47
2024 75 7.6 9.8 38.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Prospect High (Continuation)

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1992 31 n/a n/a 9.7
1993 35 2.0 17.5 0
1994 38 2.0 19.0 0
1995 40 2.0 20.0 7.5
1996 40 2.0 20.0 7.5
1997 42 2.0 21.0 0
1998 38 2.0 19.0 10.5
1999 39 2.0 19.5 0
2000 40 2.0 20.0 0
2001 37 1.0 37.0 0
2002 37 3.0 12.3 10.8
2003 37 3.0 12.3 10.8
2004 48 2.0 24.0 12.5
2005 48 2.0 24.0 10.4
2006 50 2.0 25.0 0
2007 50 2.0 25.0 22
2008 44 3.0 14.7 36.4
2009 50 2.0 16.7 0
2010 47 2.0 23.5 6.4
2011 47 n/a n/a 10.6
2012 46 2.0 23.0 n/a
2013 51 2.0 25.5 52.9
2014 36 2.0 18.0 44.4
2015 26 2.0 13.0 46.2
2016 48 2.0 24.0 62.5
2017 46 2.5 18.1 58.7
2018 53 2.2 24.0 45.3
2019 54 2.0 27.0 40.7
2020 51 n/a n/a 39.2
2021 46 3.5 12.8 43.5
2022 58 4.7 12.3 39.7
2023 66 4.9 13.3 47
2024 75 7.6 9.8 38.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Prospect High (Continuation)

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $17,690

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Prospect High (Continuation)

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Ranks 1970th of 2133 High schoolsRanks 2227th of 2348 High schools
 2.5%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Prospect High (Continuation))4.88.6
 3.8%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Mt. Diablo Unified)54.653.8
 0.8%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)57.355.4
 1.9%
11th Grade Mathematics (Prospect High (Continuation))00
   11th Grade Mathematics (Mt. Diablo Unified)32.827.8
 5%
   11th Grade Mathematics (California)32.227.4
 4.9%

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students5466
 22.2%
African American23
 50%
American Indian10
 100%
Asian25
 150%
Hispanic2339
 69.6%
Pacific Islander00
White2312
 47.8%
Two or More Races36
 100%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients40.7%47%
 6.2%


Schools Near Prospect High (Continuation)









Frequently Asked Questions about Prospect High (Continuation)

Prospect High (Continuation) ranks in the bottom 12.6% of California high schools.

In the 2023-24 school year, 75 students attended Prospect High (Continuation).

Students at Prospect High (Continuation) are 67% Hispanic, 24% White, 3% Pacific Islander, 3% Two or more races, 1% African American, 1% Asian, 1% Not Specified.


Rate Prospect High (Continuation)!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Prospect High (Continuation)!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics
g12_062637010197 retrieved from Memory in 0 milliseconds.
None retrieved from Database in 2898 milliseconds.