Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Summary:

Spring Hill High (Continuation) is a small public high school in Mariposa, California, serving grades 9-12 and part of the Mariposa County Unified School District. With just 24 students, the school has consistently struggled academically, ranking among the lowest-performing high schools in the state.

Spring Hill High (Continuation) has a 0-star rating from SchoolDigger, indicating very poor academic performance. Only 0% of its students are proficient or better in English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science, significantly lower than the district and state averages. The school also faces high dropout rates, ranging from 7.1% to 27.3% over the past five years, and extremely high chronic absenteeism rates, reaching as high as 97.9% in the 2020-2021 school year. Its four-year graduation rates have fluctuated between 63.9% and 89.3%, much lower than the 97.8% rate at the nearby Mariposa County High School.

Despite the challenges, the data suggests that there may be opportunities for improvement at Spring Hill High (Continuation). The school serves a high percentage of economically disadvantaged students, which may contribute to the unique challenges it faces. By implementing targeted strategies to improve student engagement, academic support, and address the specific needs of its student population, the school and district may be able to help these students succeed and close the performance gap with nearby schools.

Detail:

Public 9-12

5171 Silva Rd.
Mariposa, CA 95338-9358

(209) 742-0290

District: Mariposa County Unified

SchoolDigger Rank:
2268^th of 2,323 California High Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures: $25,281

Student/teacher ratio: 14.2

Number of students: 29

Racial breakdown:

White:

65.5%

Hispanic:

20.7%

American Indian:

10.3%

Free/discounted lunch recipients: 93.1%

See top rated California high schools

Compare Spring Hill High (Continuation) to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends

Compare Details Spring Hill High (Continuation) ranks worse than 97.6% of high schools in California. (See more...)

Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 6.56. (See more...)

The four-year cohort graduation rate measures the percentage of students at Spring Hill High (Continuation) who earn a standard high school diploma within four years of starting ninth grade.

The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.

Chronic absenteeism in a school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.

Student Body

Compare Details Racial makeup is: White (65.5%), Hispanic (20.7%), American Indian (10.3%). (See more...)

Compare Details 93.1% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. This is the highest percentage in the Mariposa County Unified School District. (See more...)

Teachers

Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Spring Hill High (Continuation) is 14.2. 2 high schools in the Mariposa County Unified School District have better student/teacher ratios. (See more...)

Compare Spring Hill High (Continuation) employs 2 full-time teachers.

Finance

Compare Details The average total spent per student at Spring Hill High (Continuation) is $25,281, which is the 2^nd highest among 2 high schools in the Mariposa County Unified School District.

Schooldigger 2024 Rankings:

Spring Hill High (Continuation):

SchoolDigger ranks Spring Hill High (Continuation) 2268^th of 2323 California public high schools. (See Spring Hill High (Continuation) in the ranking list.)

High School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:

Low Socio Economic Status students:

Male students:

Mariposa County Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Mariposa County Unified 1045^th of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)

What do you think?

Your rating for Spring Hill High (Continuation)?

(Ranking FAQ)

Rank History for Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Compare

Rank History for all students at Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	CA State Percentile
2004	35.26	800^th	1653	51.6%
2005	37.46	871^st	1901	54.2%
2006	43.03	778^th	1968	60.5%
2007	42.39	812^th	2063	60.6%
2008	37.57	972^nd	2117	54.1%
2009	6.80	2167^th	2238	3.2%
2010	4.70	2096^th	2281	8.1%
2022	9.02	2099^th	2123	1.1%
2024	6.56	2268^th	2323	2.4%

See the entire list of California High School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	CA State Percentile	SchoolDigger Rating
2024	6.50	2183^rd	2235	2.3%

See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Male students at Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Year	Avg Standard Score	Statewide Rank	Total # Ranked High Schools	CA State Percentile	SchoolDigger Rating
2024	6.36	2115^th	2172	2.6%

See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Male Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Spring Hill High (Continuation).

If you have first-hand knowledge about Spring Hill High (Continuation), submit a rating!

Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!

Enrollment information for Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	White	African American	Asian	Hispanic	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Not Specified	Total
1988	90	0	1	4	6	n/a	n/a	0	101
1989	110	8	1	8	14	n/a	n/a	0	141
1990	74	4	0	4	7	n/a	n/a	0	89
1991	61	2	0	10	7	n/a	n/a	0	80
1992	57	17	9	24	4	n/a	n/a	0	111
1993	42	10	2	21	6	n/a	n/a	0	81
1994	33	6	1	19	7	n/a	n/a	0	66
1995	90	1	0	5	7	n/a	n/a	0	103
1996	90	1	0	5	7	n/a	n/a	0	103
1997	40	5	0	6	4	n/a	n/a	0	55
1998	44	0	0	6	8	n/a	n/a	0	58
1999	55	0	0	9	9	n/a	n/a	0	73
2000	37	0	0	3	11	n/a	n/a	0	51
2001	39	0	0	0	13	n/a	n/a	0	52
2002	24	1	0	1	2	n/a	n/a	2	30
2003	24	1	0	1	2	n/a	n/a	2	30
2004	35	0	0	5	8	n/a	n/a	0	48
2005	41	1	0	5	3	n/a	n/a	5	55
2006	38	1	0	4	3	n/a	n/a	4	50
2007	32	0	0	6	8	n/a	n/a	5	51
2008	39	n/a	1	7	7	n/a	n/a	0	54
2009	14	0	0	2	0	1	3	0	20
2010	9	0	0	0	4	1	1	0	15
2011	8	0	0	3	4	0	0	0	15
2016	9	0	0	4	2	0	1	0	16
2017	5	0	0	6	1	0	0	0	12
2018	5	0	0	5	2	0	1	0	13
2019	10	0	0	6	0	0	6	0	22
2020	13	1	0	6	0	0	4	0	24
2021	17	1	0	15	3	0	2	0	38
2022	21	1	0	9	2	0	0	0	33
2023	14	1	0	8	0	0	1	0	24
2024	19	0	0	6	3	0	1	0	29

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1988	101	4.4	22.9	n/a
1989	141	4.8	29.3	n/a
1990	89	4.5	19.7	n/a
1991	80	3.5	22.8	n/a
1992	111	3.6	30.8	19.8
1993	81	4.0	20.3	18.5
1994	66	4.0	16.5	16.7
1995	103	7.1	14.5	35
1996	103	7.1	14.5	35
1997	55	5.0	11.0	41.8
1998	58	4.0	14.5	74.1
1999	73	4.4	16.6	87.7
2000	51	5.0	10.2	68.6
2001	52	5.0	10.4	71.2
2002	30	5.0	6.0	78.6
2003	30	5.0	6.0	78.6
2004	48	5.0	9.6	64.6
2005	55	4.5	12.2	78
2006	50	5.0	10.0	84.8
2007	51	4.0	12.8	76.1
2008	54	5.0	10.8	50
2009	20	3.0	6.7	50
2010	15	2.7	5.5	60
2011	15	n/a	n/a	46.7
2016	16	2.0	8.0	93.8
2017	12	2.4	4.9	75
2018	13	2.4	5.3	76.9
2019	22	2.0	11.0	81.8
2020	24	n/a	n/a	87.5
2021	38	2.7	13.6	86.8
2022	33	3.3	9.8	90.9
2023	24	2.4	9.9	66.7
2024	29	2.0	14.2	93.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Compare

Year	# Students	Full-time Teachers	Student/Teacher ratio	% Free/Discounted Lunch
1988	101	4.4	22.9	n/a
1989	141	4.8	29.3	n/a
1990	89	4.5	19.7	n/a
1991	80	3.5	22.8	n/a
1992	111	3.6	30.8	19.8
1993	81	4.0	20.3	18.5
1994	66	4.0	16.5	16.7
1995	103	7.1	14.5	35
1996	103	7.1	14.5	35
1997	55	5.0	11.0	41.8
1998	58	4.0	14.5	74.1
1999	73	4.4	16.6	87.7
2000	51	5.0	10.2	68.6
2001	52	5.0	10.4	71.2
2002	30	5.0	6.0	78.6
2003	30	5.0	6.0	78.6
2004	48	5.0	9.6	64.6
2005	55	4.5	12.2	78
2006	50	5.0	10.0	84.8
2007	51	4.0	12.8	76.1
2008	54	5.0	10.8	50
2009	20	3.0	6.7	50
2010	15	2.7	5.5	60
2011	15	n/a	n/a	46.7
2016	16	2.0	8.0	93.8
2017	12	2.4	4.9	75
2018	13	2.4	5.3	76.9
2019	22	2.0	11.0	81.8
2020	24	n/a	n/a	87.5
2021	38	2.7	13.6	86.8
2022	33	3.3	9.8	90.9
2023	24	2.4	9.9	66.7
2024	29	2.0	14.2	93.1

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.

Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Year	Total Expenditures Per Pupil
2018	$25,281

Data source: California Department of Education

Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Spring Hill High (Continuation)

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

	Number of students Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)	Number of students Post pandemic (2022-2023)	Change (%)
Total Students	22	24	9.1%
African American	0	1
American Indian	0	0
Asian	0	0
Hispanic	6	8	33.3%
Pacific Islander	0	0
White	10	14	40%
Two or More Races	6	1	83.3%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	81.8%	66.7%	15.2%

Schools Near Spring Hill High (Continuation)

Choose columns to see: Summary School Students/Teachers Ranking Test Scores Finance All

School													Students/Teachers											Ranking (2024)				Ranking (2023)				CAST Science (2024)		Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy (2024)		Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics (2024)		Per Pupil Expenditures (2018)
Name	Type	Grades	Address	City	Zip	County	District	Is Charter	Is Magnet	Is Virtual	Is Title I	Phone	Enrollment	Full-time Teachers	Student/ Teacher Ratio	Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	American Indian	Pacific Islander	Two or More Races	Average Standard Score (2024)	Statewide Rank (2024)	State Percentile (2024)	SchoolDigger Rating (2024)	Average Standard Score (2023)	Statewide Rank (2023)	State Percentile (2023)	Rank Change from Previous Year	CAST Science 11th Grade	CAST Science End of Course	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments English Language Arts/Literacy End of Course	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics 11th Grade	Smarter Balanced Assessments Mathematics End of Course	Total
Spring Hill High (Continuation)	Public	9-12	5171 Silva Rd.	Mariposa	95338	Mariposa County	Mariposa County Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(209) 742-0290	29	2	14.2	93.1%	19 (65.5%)	0 (0.0%)	6 (20.7%)	0 (0.0%)	3 (10.3%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (3.4%)	6.6	2268^th of 2323 public high schools	2.4%					(n/a)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	$25,281
Mariposa County High	Public	9-12	5074 Old Hwy.	Mariposa	95338	Mariposa County	Mariposa County Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(209) 742-0260	457	28	16.1	64.1%	290 (63.5%)	4 (0.9%)	109 (23.9%)	5 (1.1%)	14 (3.1%)	0 (0.0%)	29 (6.3%)	55.8	729^th of 2323 public high schools	68.6%		56.5	722^nd of 2348 public high schools	69.3%	7	31.8	31.4	55.3	55.3	22.1	22.1	$10,531
Yosemite Park High	Public	9-12	9670 Rancheria Flat Rd.	Yosemite National Park	95318	Mariposa County	Mariposa County Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(209) 372-2414	2	2	1.1		2 (100.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)								(n/a)							$101,726
Glacier High School Charter	Public, Charter	9-12	41267 Highway 41	Oakhurst	93644	Madera County	Glacier High School Charter District	Yes	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 642-1422	82	6	13.1	50.0%	56 (68.3%)	0 (0.0%)	12 (14.6%)	3 (3.7%)	2 (2.4%)	0 (0.0%)	9 (11.0%)	90.7	147^th of 2323 public high schools	93.7%		69.9	483^rd of 2348 public high schools	79.4%	336	73.3	68.2	89.5	89.5	42.1	42.1
Evergreen High	Public	9-12	50200 Road 427	Oakhurst	93644	Madera County	Yosemite Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 683-4667	45	2	19.3	86.7%	24 (53.3%)	1 (2.2%)	14 (31.1%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (2.2%)	0 (0.0%)	5 (11.1%)								(n/a)							$5,748
Yosemite High	Public	9-12	50200 Road 427	Oakhurst	93644	Madera County	Yosemite Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 683-4667	557	26	21.0	58.3%	334 (60.0%)	4 (0.7%)	158 (28.4%)	8 (1.4%)	21 (3.8%)	0 (0.0%)	28 (5.0%)	30.6	1407^th of 2323 public high schools	39.4%		51.9	827^th of 2348 public high schools	64.8%	580	15.9	15.2	38.7	38.7	13.5	13.5	$7,307
Ahwahnee High	Public	9-12	50407 Hangtree Ln.	Oakhurst	93644	Madera County	Yosemite Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 683-4667	21	1	15.3	85.7%	13 (61.9%)	0 (0.0%)	8 (38.1%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)								(n/a)							$5,748
Campbell High Community Day	Public	9-12	39890 Road 428	Oakhurst	93644	Madera County	Yosemite Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 683-4667	0				0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()	0 ()								(n/a)
Raymond Granite High	Public	9-12	38828 Road 600	Raymond	93653	Madera County	Yosemite Unified	No	(n/a)	No	(n/a)	(559) 683-8801	4	2	1.9		1 (25.0%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (25.0%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (25.0%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (25.0%)								(n/a)							$5,748

Frequently Asked Questions about Spring Hill High (Continuation)

How many students attend Spring Hill High (Continuation)?

In the 2023-24 school year, 29 students attended Spring Hill High (Continuation).

What is the racial makeup of Spring Hill High (Continuation)?

Students at Spring Hill High (Continuation) are 66% White, 21% Hispanic, 10% American Indian, 3% Two or more races.

Is Spring Hill High (Continuation) a good school?

Spring Hill High (Continuation) ranks in the bottom 2.4% of California high schools.

What district is Spring Hill High (Continuation) in?

Mariposa County Unified

Rate Spring Hill High (Continuation)!

Other helpful SchoolDigger resources...

Compare to nearby schools

CACalifornia High School Rankings

CACalifornia District Rankings

Schools in Mariposa, CA

Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Spring Hill High (Continuation)!

SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.