Evergreen Continuation

Summary:

Evergreen Continuation is a public high school located in Sylmar, California, serving grades 9-12 with a total enrollment of 63 students. The school is part of the Los Angeles Unified school district, which is ranked 871 out of 1,568 districts in the state and has a 2-star rating from SchoolDigger.

Evergreen Continuation has consistently ranked among the lowest-performing high schools in California, maintaining a 0-star rating from SchoolDigger for most of the past decade. The school has struggled with low graduation rates, ranging from 41.5% to 86.4% over the past five years, and high dropout rates, ranging from 7.6% to 28.3% during the same period. Chronic absenteeism is also a significant issue, with rates ranging from 68.7% to 83.9% over the past five years. Academically, Evergreen Continuation has consistently had 0% of its students scoring proficient or better on state assessments, significantly underperforming the district and state averages.

In comparison, nearby schools such as Cesar E. Chavez Learning Acads-Academy of Scientific Explr (ASE) and Sylmar Charter High generally perform better than Evergreen Continuation on key metrics like graduation rates, test scores, and chronic absenteeism. Evergreen Continuation's struggles are particularly pronounced for male students, Hispanic students, and students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds, ranking in the bottom 10-15% of California high schools for these subgroups.


Detail:

Public 9-12

 13101 Dronfield Ave.
       Sylmar, CA  91342-4360


(818) 367-5989

District: Los Angeles Unified

SchoolDigger Rank:
2206th of 2,323 California High Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $15,774 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  15.3 Help
Number of students:  63

Racial breakdown:

Not Specified:
100.0%

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  93.7% Help


 See top rated California high schools

 Compare Evergreen Continuation to nearby high schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Evergreen Continuation ranks worse than 95% of high schools in California. It also ranks 152nd among 158 ranked high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 7.62. (See more...)
Help
The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) measures the percentage of Evergreen Continuation freshmen who graduate within four years, adjusting for students who transfer in or out.
Help
The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details 93.7% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Evergreen Continuation is 15.3, which is the 55th best among 158 high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Evergreen Continuation employs 4.1 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Evergreen Continuation is $15,774, which is the 51st highest among 158 high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Schooldigger 2024 Rankings:

Evergreen Continuation:

SchoolDigger ranks Evergreen Continuation 2206th of 2323 California public high schools. (See Evergreen Continuation in the ranking list.)

High School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:


Low Socio Economic Status students:
Male students:
Hispanic students:


Los Angeles Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Los Angeles Unified 871st of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Evergreen Continuation?

Rank History for Evergreen Continuation

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Evergreen Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 14.01 1519th 1653 8.1%
2005 16.12 1537th 1901 19.1%
2006 17.50 1541st 1968 21.7%
2007 13.52 1774th 2063 14.0%
2008 17.52 1638th 2117 22.6%
2009 25.71 1586th 2238 29.1%
2010 21.68 1551st 2281 32.0%
2011 15.42 1828th 2367 22.8%
2012 8.98 2044th 2354 13.2%
2013 13.02 1983rd 2426 18.3%
2015 10.99 1769th 1994 11.3%
2017 8.95 1953rd 2021 3.4%
2018 10.06 1860th 2017 7.8%
2019 10.31 2026th 2133 5.0%
2022 8.56 2120th 2123 0.1%
2023 6.99 2264th 2348 3.6%
2024 7.62 2206th 2323 5.0%
See the entire list of California High School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Evergreen Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 10.70 1685th 1862 9.5%
2019 9.96 1871st 1937 3.4%
2023 6.42 2198th 2247 2.2%
2024 7.70 2119th 2235 5.2%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Female students at Evergreen Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 7.07 1715th 1760 2.6%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for Male students at Evergreen Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 11.23 1591st 1834 13.2%
2019 9.05 1840th 1880 2.1%
2023 6.26 2171st 2207 1.6%
2024 7.27 2074th 2172 4.5%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for Hispanic students at Evergreen Continuation

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 10.02 1577th 1742 9.5%
2019 10.70 1690th 1814 6.8%
2022 8.33 1859th 1861 0.1%
2023 6.76 2063rd 2142 3.7%
2024 7.57 1998th 2125 6.0%
See the entire list of Best California High Schools for Hispanic Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Evergreen Continuation Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 





Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Evergreen Continuation.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Evergreen Continuation, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Evergreen Continuation

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 62 10 2 32 0 n/a n/a 0 106
1989 40 6 1 49 0 n/a n/a 0 96
1990 26 6 0 50 0 n/a n/a 0 82
1991 23 10 1 39 0 n/a n/a 0 73
1992 14 11 1 56 1 n/a n/a 0 83
1993 21 2 0 57 2 n/a n/a 0 82
1994 13 7 0 35 0 n/a n/a 0 55
1995 10 7 1 21 1 n/a n/a 0 40
1996 10 7 1 21 1 n/a n/a 0 40
1997 8 5 0 43 0 n/a n/a 0 56
1998 8 4 0 37 0 n/a n/a 0 49
1999 5 1 0 59 0 n/a n/a 0 65
2000 3 2 0 49 0 n/a n/a 0 54
2001 5 4 0 38 0 n/a n/a 0 47
2002 3 2 0 57 2 n/a n/a 0 64
2003 3 2 0 57 2 n/a n/a 0 64
2004 6 2 2 67 2 n/a n/a 0 79
2005 5 4 2 70 0 n/a n/a 0 81
2006 5 5 0 61 2 n/a n/a 0 73
2007 4 4 0 65 1 n/a n/a 0 74
2008 2 7 n/a 63 1 n/a n/a 0 73
2009 2 3 0 70 0 0 1 0 76
2010 0 1 0 75 0 0 2 0 78
2011 4 4 0 81 0 0 0 0 89
2012 5 9 0 87 0 0 0 0 101
2013 3 5 0 105 3 0 0 0 116
2014 4 5 1 94 1 0 0 0 105
2015 3 4 0 64 0 0 0 0 71
2016 3 3 2 59 0 0 0 0 67
2017 2 3 1 62 0 0 0 0 68
2018 4 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 74
2019 2 1 0 70 0 0 0 0 73
2020 2 5 0 56 0 0 0 0 63
2021 0 0 2 48 0 0 0 0 50
2022 1 0 3 43 0 0 0 0 47
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 63

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Evergreen Continuation

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 106 3.0 35.3 n/a
1989 96 3.0 32.0 n/a
1990 82 4.0 20.5 n/a
1991 73 4.0 18.2 n/a
1992 83 4.1 20.2 12
1993 82 3.5 23.4 15.9
1994 55 4.0 13.8 36.4
1995 40 4.0 10.0 42.5
1996 40 4.0 10.0 42.5
1997 56 3.0 18.7 51.8
1998 49 3.0 16.3 85.7
1999 65 3.0 21.7 53.8
2000 54 3.0 18.0 68.5
2001 47 3.0 15.7 61.7
2002 64 4.0 16.0 75
2003 64 4.0 16.0 75
2004 79 4.0 19.8 96.2
2005 81 4.0 20.3 91.4
2006 73 4.2 17.4 95.9
2007 74 4.4 16.8 81.1
2008 73 5.0 14.6 61.6
2009 76 4.0 15.2 77.6
2010 78 4.0 19.5 70.5
2011 89 n/a n/a 59.6
2012 101 4.0 25.1 n/a
2013 116 4.5 25.7 67.2
2014 105 4.5 23.3 69.5
2015 71 4.0 17.7 67.6
2016 67 4.0 16.7 79.1
2017 68 5.0 13.6 92.6
2018 74 4.0 18.5 82.4
2019 73 4.5 16.2 86.3
2020 63 n/a n/a 82.5
2021 50 3.5 14.2 94
2022 47 4.0 11.7 91.5
2023 63 4.1 15.3 93.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Evergreen Continuation

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 106 3.0 35.3 n/a
1989 96 3.0 32.0 n/a
1990 82 4.0 20.5 n/a
1991 73 4.0 18.2 n/a
1992 83 4.1 20.2 12
1993 82 3.5 23.4 15.9
1994 55 4.0 13.8 36.4
1995 40 4.0 10.0 42.5
1996 40 4.0 10.0 42.5
1997 56 3.0 18.7 51.8
1998 49 3.0 16.3 85.7
1999 65 3.0 21.7 53.8
2000 54 3.0 18.0 68.5
2001 47 3.0 15.7 61.7
2002 64 4.0 16.0 75
2003 64 4.0 16.0 75
2004 79 4.0 19.8 96.2
2005 81 4.0 20.3 91.4
2006 73 4.2 17.4 95.9
2007 74 4.4 16.8 81.1
2008 73 5.0 14.6 61.6
2009 76 4.0 15.2 77.6
2010 78 4.0 19.5 70.5
2011 89 n/a n/a 59.6
2012 101 4.0 25.1 n/a
2013 116 4.5 25.7 67.2
2014 105 4.5 23.3 69.5
2015 71 4.0 17.7 67.6
2016 67 4.0 16.7 79.1
2017 68 5.0 13.6 92.6
2018 74 4.0 18.5 82.4
2019 73 4.5 16.2 86.3
2020 63 n/a n/a 82.5
2021 50 3.5 14.2 94
2022 47 4.0 11.7 91.5
2023 63 4.1 15.3 93.7

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Evergreen Continuation

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $15,774

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Evergreen Continuation

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Ranks 2026th of 2133 High schoolsRanks 2264th of 2348 High schools
 1.4%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Evergreen Continuation)5.90
 5.9%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Los Angeles Unified)51.748.9
 2.8%
   11th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)57.355.4
 1.9%
11th Grade Mathematics (Evergreen Continuation)00
   11th Grade Mathematics (Los Angeles Unified)25.320
 5.4%
   11th Grade Mathematics (California)32.227.4
 4.9%
12th Grade Science (Evergreen Continuation)00
   12th Grade Science (Los Angeles Unified)8.27.5
 0.6%
   12th Grade Science (California)25.626.9
 1.3%

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students7363
 13.7%
African American10
 100%
American Indian00
Asian00
Hispanic700
 100%
Pacific Islander00
White20
 100%
Two or More Races00
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients86.3%93.7%
 7.3%


Schools Near Evergreen Continuation









Frequently Asked Questions about Evergreen Continuation

Students at Evergreen Continuation are 100% Not Specified.

In the 2022-23 school year, 63 students attended Evergreen Continuation.

Evergreen Continuation ranks in the bottom 5.0% of California high schools.


Rate Evergreen Continuation!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Evergreen Continuation!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 158 milliseconds.