Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Summary:

Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet is a public elementary school serving 382 students in grades K-5 in Chatsworth, California, part of the Los Angeles Unified School District. Over the past several years, the school has steadily improved its statewide ranking, moving from 2054 out of 5789 California elementary schools in 2018-2019 to 1495 out of 5862 in 2023-2024, earning a 4-star rating from SchoolDigger.

Chatsworth Park Elementary consistently outperforms the Los Angeles Unified School District and the state of California in standardized test scores across all grade levels and subject areas. In 2023-2024, 56.85% of students were proficient or better in English Language Arts/Literacy, compared to 43.06% for LAUSD and 47.04% for California. In math, 54.5% of students were proficient or better, compared to 32.83% for LAUSD and 35.54% for California. The school's subgroups, including female students, Hispanic students, and low socioeconomic status students, all perform at a high level compared to their peers across the state.

While Chatsworth Park Elementary has seen an increase in chronic absenteeism, reaching 24.7% in 2022-2023, this rate is still lower than many of the nearby schools, such as Limerick Avenue Elementary (30.2%), Germain Academy for Academic Achievement (30.7%), and Nevada Avenue Elementary (31.0%). The only nearby school that outperforms Chatsworth Park Elementary is Porter Ranch Community, a high-performing charter school.


Detail:

Public K-5

 22005 Devonshire St.
       Chatsworth, CA  91311-2841


(818) 341-1371

District: Los Angeles Unified

SchoolDigger Rank:
1495th of 5,862 California Elementary Schools

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $10,485 Help


Students who attend Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet usually attend:

Middle:    Ernest Lawrence Middle
High:    Chatsworth Charter High

Student/teacher ratio:  21.2 Help
Number of students:  382

Racial breakdown:

Not Specified:
100.0%

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  55% Help


 See top rated California elementary schools

 Compare Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet to nearby elementary schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet ranks better than 74.5% of elementary schools in California. It also ranks 89th among 486 ranked elementary schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2024 the calculated Average Standard Score was 71.92. (See more...)
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details 55% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet is 21.2. 332 elementary schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District have better student/teacher ratios. (See more...)
Help
Compare Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet employs 18 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet is $10,485. 350 elementary schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District spend more per student.
Schooldigger 2024 Rankings:

Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet:

SchoolDigger ranks Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet 1495th of 5862 California public elementary schools. (See Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet in the ranking list.)

Elementary School Test Score Ratings by Student Subgroup:


Low Socio Economic Status students:
Female students:
Male students:
Hispanic students:
White students:


Los Angeles Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Los Angeles Unified 871st of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet?

Rank History for Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 49.10 2195th 4809 54.4%
2005 37.86 2838th 4822 41.1%
2006 52.87 2053rd 4818 57.4%
2007 54.87 2071st 5113 59.5%
2008 54.26 2151st 5113 57.9%
2009 52.50 2331st 5193 55.1%
2010 45.88 2801st 5314 47.3%
2011 64.86 1755th 5377 67.4%
2012 65.74 1749th 5390 67.6%
2013 56.21 2335th 5530 57.8%
2015 59.87 1951st 5611 65.2%
2016 54.74 2252nd 5614 59.9%
2017 37.13 3302nd 5692 42.0%
2018 44.97 2830th 5662 50.0%
2019 60.28 2054th 5789 64.5%
2022 67.78 1700th 5883 71.1%
2023 79.64 1182nd 5874 79.9%
2024 71.92 1495th 5862 74.5%
See the entire list of California Elementary School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 48.50 2461st 5084 51.6%
2019 74.04 973rd 5173 81.2%
2022 75.41 936th 5264 82.2%
2023 86.98 493rd 5374 90.8%
2024 69.49 1282nd 5511 76.7%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Female students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 40.99 3022nd 5413 44.2%
2019 55.78 2188th 5492 60.2%
2022 67.63 1615th 5635 71.3%
2023 75.45 1271st 5617 77.4%
2024 73.46 1336th 5605 76.2%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Female Students!

Rank History for Disabled students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2022 54.27 712th 2227 68.0%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Disabled Students!

Rank History for Male students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 47.98 2573rd 5431 52.6%
2019 62.71 1836th 5510 66.7%
2022 66.20 1678th 5663 70.4%
2023 80.03 1093rd 5650 80.7%
2024 67.32 1645th 5636 70.8%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for Hispanic students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 44.44 2586th 4830 46.5%
2019 63.99 1466th 4963 70.5%
2022 75.16 926th 5084 81.8%
2023 87.70 446th 5098 91.3%
2024 70.52 1165th 5102 77.2%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for Hispanic Students!

Rank History for White students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Elementary Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 23.15 2258th 2737 17.5%
2019 40.52 1839th 2834 35.1%
2023 49.02 1456th 2662 45.3%
2024 67.49 893rd 2647 66.3%
See the entire list of Best California Elementary Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 






Data source: California Department of Education

Review counts

All ratings (Avg rating: 1)
0%

0%

0%

0%

100%

  

by a parent
Monday, March 14, 2016

Open Quote This school will not be my first choice to send my child, or even my last. This school has too many bullies, and nothing is ever done about it. The after school program has 85 children to 1 adult, very unsafe. Not enough eyes to keep watch on the kids. I'm offended how the principle handles confrontations, I received a letter that I basically verbally abused a child when in fact I went to the school to confront the coach after school and the little girl approached me and started to bad mouth me AND get in my face. After yelling at her, and yelling to go get her mother the confrontation escalated. The mother did absolutely NOTHING to her daughter about why she bullied my niece and how disrespectful she was yelling at an adult. And to top it off the school was more concerned about sending me a letter about my behavior instead of caring why I was so upset that my niece was being BULLIED by this little girl and her friend!!! Since when was it okay to allow bulling? and when will it stop!!! we need more proactive teachers and staff, and parent cooperation. Close Quote



Enrollment information for Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1988 341 14 71 65 0 n/a n/a 0 491
1989 347 23 69 123 2 n/a n/a 0 564
1990 341 36 84 154 1 n/a n/a 0 616
1991 319 23 80 201 2 n/a n/a 0 625
1992 276 27 89 174 1 n/a n/a 0 567
1993 292 16 97 134 2 n/a n/a 0 541
1994 257 16 85 95 1 n/a n/a 0 454
1995 201 17 79 125 4 n/a n/a 0 426
1996 201 17 79 125 4 n/a n/a 0 426
1997 212 23 88 127 7 n/a n/a 0 457
1998 210 29 86 118 3 n/a n/a 0 446
1999 202 37 79 120 0 n/a n/a 0 438
2000 203 37 81 128 5 n/a n/a 0 454
2001 216 34 82 131 4 n/a n/a 0 467
2002 192 42 87 147 5 n/a n/a 0 473
2003 192 42 87 147 5 n/a n/a 0 473
2004 163 41 82 137 3 n/a n/a 0 426
2005 169 45 70 145 3 n/a n/a 0 432
2006 174 38 60 154 5 n/a n/a 0 431
2007 160 39 76 131 3 n/a n/a 1 410
2008 140 47 74 134 3 n/a n/a 0 398
2009 145 46 77 122 3 4 1 0 398
2010 138 40 64 137 0 2 6 0 387
2011 117 42 74 133 2 3 0 0 371
2012 121 40 81 147 3 3 1 0 396
2013 100 43 69 152 4 2 0 0 370
2014 96 48 71 159 5 1 0 0 380
2015 91 27 67 156 2 1 24 0 368
2016 78 20 47 177 2 2 21 0 347
2017 95 22 48 191 1 2 31 0 390
2018 93 28 54 189 1 1 31 0 397
2019 103 39 51 197 1 2 2 0 395
2020 93 28 54 205 0 0 34 0 414
2021 97 27 69 215 0 0 38 0 446
2022 71 19 56 187 0 0 43 0 376
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 382 382

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 491 19.0 25.8 n/a
1989 564 20.0 28.2 n/a
1990 616 21.0 29.3 n/a
1991 625 21.0 29.7 n/a
1992 567 21.3 26.6 28.7
1993 541 19.0 28.5 29.2
1994 454 17.0 26.7 30.6
1995 426 15.0 28.4 33.8
1996 426 15.0 28.4 33.8
1997 457 19.0 24.1 33.3
1998 446 21.0 21.2 31.2
1999 438 23.0 19.0 35.8
2000 454 23.8 19.1 38.5
2001 467 23.8 19.6 19.1
2002 473 25.5 18.5 37
2003 473 25.5 18.5 37
2004 426 22.3 19.1 40.1
2005 432 22.0 19.6 41.9
2006 431 23.5 18.3 42
2007 410 22.5 18.2 38.1
2008 398 24.0 16.6 42
2009 398 22.0 16.6 41.5
2010 387 18.0 21.5 44.4
2011 371 n/a n/a 44.5
2012 396 15.0 26.4 n/a
2013 370 15.0 24.6 52.2
2014 380 17.0 22.3 57.4
2015 368 16.0 23.0 55.2
2016 347 15.0 23.1 63.1
2017 390 17.0 22.9 65.1
2018 397 17.0 23.3 65.7
2019 395 17.0 23.2 66.1
2020 414 n/a n/a 60.4
2021 446 18.0 24.7 62.6
2022 376 18.0 20.8 52.7
2023 382 18.0 21.2 55

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1988 491 19.0 25.8 n/a
1989 564 20.0 28.2 n/a
1990 616 21.0 29.3 n/a
1991 625 21.0 29.7 n/a
1992 567 21.3 26.6 28.7
1993 541 19.0 28.5 29.2
1994 454 17.0 26.7 30.6
1995 426 15.0 28.4 33.8
1996 426 15.0 28.4 33.8
1997 457 19.0 24.1 33.3
1998 446 21.0 21.2 31.2
1999 438 23.0 19.0 35.8
2000 454 23.8 19.1 38.5
2001 467 23.8 19.6 19.1
2002 473 25.5 18.5 37
2003 473 25.5 18.5 37
2004 426 22.3 19.1 40.1
2005 432 22.0 19.6 41.9
2006 431 23.5 18.3 42
2007 410 22.5 18.2 38.1
2008 398 24.0 16.6 42
2009 398 22.0 16.6 41.5
2010 387 18.0 21.5 44.4
2011 371 n/a n/a 44.5
2012 396 15.0 26.4 n/a
2013 370 15.0 24.6 52.2
2014 380 17.0 22.3 57.4
2015 368 16.0 23.0 55.2
2016 347 15.0 23.1 63.1
2017 390 17.0 22.9 65.1
2018 397 17.0 23.3 65.7
2019 395 17.0 23.2 66.1
2020 414 n/a n/a 60.4
2021 446 18.0 24.7 62.6
2022 376 18.0 20.8 52.7
2023 382 18.0 21.2 55

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.

Kindergarten Immunization Rates

Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help
Compare
YearCompletely ImmunizedReligious ExemptionMedical ExemptionConditionalPolioHepatitis BVaricellaDTPMMR
201284.0%10.0%0.0%5.0%90.0%88.0%86.0%90.0%90.0%
201379.0%0.0%0.0%21.0%95.0%93.0%96.0%86.0%91.0%
201492.0%3.0%0.0%6.0%94.0%94.0%96.0%94.0%97.0%
201589.0%3.0%0.0%8.0%94.0%97.0%97.0%89.0%92.0%
201692.0%4.0%0.0%4.0%96.0%96.0%95.0%95.0%95.0%
201796.0%0.0%0.0%4.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%96.0%
2018≥98.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≤2.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%
201996.0%0.0%3.0%97.0%≥98.0%≥98.0%97.0%96.0%
202091.0%1.5%6.0%97.0%92.5%94.0%97.0%97.0%
202190.1%0.0%1.4%93.0%94.4%93.0%93.0%94.4%

Data source: California Department of Public Health
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $10,485

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Rankings

Rank
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Rank
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Ranks 2054th of 5789 Elementary schoolsRanks 1182nd of 5874 Elementary schools
 15.4%

Test Scores

% proficient
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
% proficient
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)55.758.6
 2.9%
   3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Los Angeles Unified)42.940.1
 2.9%
   3rd Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)48.543
 5.6%
3rd Grade Mathematics (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)55.763.8
 8%
   3rd Grade Mathematics (Los Angeles Unified)44.442.8
 1.6%
   3rd Grade Mathematics (California)50.245.1
 5.1%
4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)60.972.9
 11.9%
   4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Los Angeles Unified)43.439.9
 3.5%
   4th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)49.543.7
 5.7%
4th Grade Mathematics (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)39.165
 25.9%
   4th Grade Mathematics (Los Angeles Unified)3837.6
 0.4%
   4th Grade Mathematics (California)44.940.8
 4.1%
5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)63.256.3
 7%
   5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (Los Angeles Unified)44.741.5
 3.1%
   5th Grade English Language Arts/Literacy (California)51.746.7
 5%
5th Grade Mathematics (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)41.246.2
 5%
   5th Grade Mathematics (Los Angeles Unified)31.130.5
 0.6%
   5th Grade Mathematics (California)3833.4
 4.6%
5th Grade Science (Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet)29.444.6
 15.2%
   5th Grade Science (Los Angeles Unified)24.324.8
 0.5%
   5th Grade Science (California)31.731.9
 0.1%

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students395382
 3.3%
African American390
 100%
American Indian10
 100%
Asian510
 100%
Hispanic1970
 100%
Pacific Islander20
 100%
White1030
 100%
Two or More Races20
 100%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients66.1%55%
 11.1%


Schools Near Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet









Frequently Asked Questions about Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet

In the 2022-23 school year, 382 students attended Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet.

Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet ranks 1495th of 5862 California elementary schools. SchoolDigger rates this school 4 stars out of 5.

Students at Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet are 100% Not Specified.

Students who attend Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet usually go on to attend:

Middle : Ernest Lawrence Middle
High : Chatsworth Charter High


Rate Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Chatsworth Park Elementary School Urban Planning/Community Development Magnet!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics
x12_062271002915 retrieved from Memory in 0 milliseconds.
None retrieved from Database in 96 milliseconds.