Rank History for James E. Moss School
Compare
Rank History for all students at James E. Moss School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2008 |
12.52 |
468th |
498 |
6.0% |
|
2009 |
22.44 |
429th |
509 |
15.7% |
|
2010 |
16.30 |
470th |
518 |
9.3% |
|
2011 |
15.31 |
518th |
563 |
8.0% |
|
2012 |
15.72 |
524th |
579 |
9.5% |
|
2013 |
13.25 |
536th |
576 |
6.9% |
|
2014 |
9.14 |
481st |
509 |
5.5% |
|
2015 |
4.70 |
524th |
537 |
2.4% |
|
2016 |
6.22 |
518th |
533 |
2.8% |
|
2017 |
5.29 |
516th |
526 |
1.9% |
|
2018 |
11.00 |
482nd |
528 |
8.7% |
|
2019 |
6.99 |
552nd |
572 |
3.5% |
|
2021 |
4.32 |
548th |
559 |
2.0% |
|
2022 |
12.27 |
486th |
551 |
11.8% |
|
2023 |
9.41 |
523rd |
561 |
6.8% |
|
2024 |
9.50 |
518th |
561 |
7.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Utah Elementary School Rankings!
Rank History for English Language Learner students at James E. Moss School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2022 |
65.48 |
6th |
26 |
76.9% |
|
2023 |
48.93 |
13th |
25 |
48.0% |
|
2024 |
41.07 |
12th |
23 |
47.8% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Utah Elementary Schools for English Language Learner Students!
Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at James E. Moss School
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Elementary Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2022 |
45.40 |
53rd |
111 |
52.3% |
|
2023 |
27.73 |
108th |
132 |
18.2% |
|
2024 |
39.91 |
103rd |
162 |
36.4% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Utah Elementary Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!
Data source: test scores: Utah State Board of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.