Rank History for Sky View High
Compare
Rank History for all students at Sky View High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2008 |
57.31 |
49th |
142 |
65.5% |
|
2009 |
55.08 |
56th |
148 |
62.2% |
|
2010 |
54.20 |
56th |
153 |
63.4% |
|
2011 |
52.42 |
66th |
164 |
59.8% |
|
2012 |
47.15 |
84th |
166 |
49.4% |
|
2013 |
60.77 |
41st |
167 |
75.4% |
|
2014 |
71.27 |
16th |
120 |
86.7% |
|
2015 |
78.50 |
10th |
131 |
92.4% |
|
2016 |
79.45 |
11th |
129 |
91.5% |
|
2017 |
77.11 |
11th |
125 |
91.2% |
|
2018 |
61.69 |
20th |
123 |
83.7% |
|
2019 |
64.75 |
39th |
136 |
71.3% |
|
2021 |
62.20 |
35th |
129 |
72.9% |
|
2022 |
66.15 |
31st |
131 |
76.3% |
|
2023 |
78.06 |
22nd |
139 |
84.2% |
|
2024 |
68.08 |
32nd |
138 |
76.8% |
|
See the entire list of
Utah High School Rankings!
Rank History for Special Education students at Sky View High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2022 |
50.21 |
7th |
16 |
56.3% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Utah High Schools for Special Education Students!
Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Sky View High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2022 |
81.91 |
10th |
84 |
88.1% |
|
2023 |
94.16 |
4th |
93 |
95.7% |
|
2024 |
86.23 |
11th |
93 |
88.2% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Utah High Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!
Rank History for White students at Sky View High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
UT State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2022 |
61.47 |
35th |
123 |
71.5% |
|
2023 |
73.31 |
21st |
122 |
82.8% |
|
2024 |
58.53 |
41st |
123 |
66.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Utah High Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: Utah State Board of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.