Rank History for William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Compare
Rank History for all students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2004 |
29.96 |
327th |
400 |
18.3% |
|
2005 |
46.96 |
444th |
692 |
35.8% |
|
2006 |
65.49 |
287th |
732 |
60.8% |
|
2007 |
67.84 |
305th |
837 |
63.6% |
|
2008 |
63.12 |
383rd |
835 |
54.1% |
|
2009 |
56.62 |
505th |
858 |
41.1% |
|
2010 |
64.12 |
431st |
895 |
51.8% |
|
2011 |
61.29 |
487th |
925 |
47.4% |
|
2012 |
68.37 |
391st |
989 |
60.5% |
|
2013 |
67.12 |
438th |
1001 |
56.2% |
|
2014 |
64.91 |
456th |
1008 |
54.8% |
|
2015 |
79.96 |
181st |
1035 |
82.5% |
|
2016 |
72.67 |
287th |
1050 |
72.7% |
|
2017 |
68.21 |
366th |
1038 |
64.7% |
|
2018 |
69.89 |
322nd |
1010 |
68.1% |
|
2019 |
76.05 |
246th |
1050 |
76.6% |
|
2021 |
77.87 |
217th |
1037 |
79.1% |
|
2022 |
71.96 |
291st |
1017 |
71.4% |
|
2023 |
80.33 |
184th |
1048 |
82.4% |
|
2024 |
83.60 |
143rd |
1046 |
86.3% |
|
See the entire list of
Ohio Middle School Rankings!
Rank History for Special Education students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2023 |
80.51 |
52nd |
590 |
91.2% |
|
2024 |
83.13 |
36th |
563 |
93.6% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for Special Education Students!
Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
72.65 |
205th |
924 |
77.8% |
|
2019 |
82.71 |
86th |
945 |
90.9% |
|
2021 |
77.01 |
150th |
923 |
83.7% |
|
2022 |
73.89 |
179th |
947 |
81.1% |
|
2023 |
89.57 |
38th |
974 |
96.1% |
|
2024 |
90.81 |
32nd |
989 |
96.8% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!
Rank History for Female students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
61.26 |
386th |
897 |
57.0% |
|
2019 |
75.75 |
231st |
917 |
74.8% |
|
2021 |
70.85 |
265th |
910 |
70.9% |
|
2022 |
64.24 |
343rd |
925 |
62.9% |
|
2023 |
74.74 |
223rd |
943 |
76.4% |
|
2024 |
77.89 |
191st |
942 |
79.7% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for Female Students!
Rank History for Disabled students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
40.11 |
381st |
643 |
40.7% |
|
2019 |
60.49 |
177th |
658 |
73.1% |
|
2021 |
51.94 |
207th |
576 |
64.1% |
|
2022 |
47.40 |
237th |
565 |
58.1% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for Disabled Students!
Rank History for Male students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
72.31 |
231st |
916 |
74.8% |
|
2019 |
72.55 |
260th |
933 |
72.1% |
|
2021 |
78.85 |
168th |
924 |
81.8% |
|
2022 |
73.22 |
234th |
946 |
75.3% |
|
2023 |
81.65 |
148th |
963 |
84.6% |
|
2024 |
85.97 |
95th |
958 |
90.1% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for Male Students!
Rank History for White students at William Crawford Intermediate Schools
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
OH State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2018 |
58.24 |
324th |
781 |
58.5% |
|
2019 |
69.80 |
244th |
796 |
69.3% |
|
2021 |
67.92 |
240th |
781 |
69.3% |
|
2022 |
60.29 |
327th |
809 |
59.6% |
|
2023 |
72.49 |
209th |
805 |
74.0% |
|
2024 |
77.33 |
162nd |
795 |
79.6% |
|
See the entire list of
Best Ohio Middle Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: Ohio Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.