Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Public 6-8

 305 Vicksburg Ln N
       Plymouth, MN  55447-3941


(763) 745-5000

District: Wayzata Public School District

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $29,949 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  10.0 Help
Number of students:  10

Racial breakdown:

African American:
50.0%
White:
30.0%
Hispanic:
20.0%

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  70% Help


 See top rated Minnesota public schools

 Compare Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) to nearby middle schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2019 the calculated Average Standard Score was 7.9. (See more...)
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Student population at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) is diverse. Racial makeup is: African American (50%), White (30%), Hispanic (20%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 70% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. This is the highest percentage in the Wayzata Public School District. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) is 10, which is the lowest among 5 middle schools in the Wayzata Public School District! (See more...)
Help
Compare Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) employs 1 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) is $29,949, which is the highest among 5 middle schools in the Wayzata Public School District!
Schooldigger Rankings:

Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Wayzata Public School District:

SchoolDigger ranks Wayzata Public School District 18th of 463 Minnesota school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)?

Rank History for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Help
Compare

Rank History for all students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2014 2.94 470th 490 4.1%
2017 28.26 395th 523 24.5%
2018 4.98 483rd 518 6.8%
2019 7.90 492nd 533 7.7%
See the entire list of Minnesota Middle School Rankings!

Rank History for Low Socio Economic Status students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2019 12.08 387th 415 6.7%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota Middle Schools for Low Socio Economic Status Students!

Rank History for Male students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 4.28 418th 438 4.6%
2019 3.60 447th 454 1.5%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota Middle Schools for Male Students!

Rank History for African American students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2019 10.31 145th 148 2.0%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota Middle Schools for African American Students!

Rank History for White students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked Middle Schools MN State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2018 0.76 421st 428 1.6%
2019 16.94 392nd 428 8.4%
See the entire list of Best Minnesota Middle Schools for White Students!

Data source: test scores: Minnesota Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.

Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.

Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    
  
Subgroup: 



Data source: Minnesota Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap).

If you have first-hand knowledge about Central Middle Alternative (Cmap), submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
2008 6 6 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 12
2009 0 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 0
2010 3 5 1 0 0 n/a n/a 0 9
2011 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 8
2012 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
2014 7 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 15
2015 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
2016 7 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 19
2017 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
2018 13 6 2 1 0 0 1 0 23
2019 14 16 1 1 0 0 2 0 34
2020 9 13 0 2 0 0 6 0 30
2021 10 13 1 6 0 0 1 0 31
2022 8 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 19
2023 12 9 2 3 0 0 3 0 29
2024 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 10

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2008 12 0.8 15.0 75
2009 0 0.4 n/a n/a
2010 9 0.8 10.5 66.7
2011 8 n/a n/a 37.5
2012 7 n/a n/a 57.1
2014 15 0.1 88.2 66.7
2015 7 n/a n/a 14.3
2016 19 n/a n/a 68.4
2017 14 0.5 27.4 50
2018 23 0.6 34.3 34.8
2019 34 1.0 34.0 47.1
2020 30 0.0 n/a 53.3
2021 31 n/a n/a 48.4
2022 19 0.0 n/a 15.8
2023 29 0.0 n/a 51.7
2024 10 1.0 10.0 70

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
2008 12 0.8 15.0 75
2009 0 0.4 n/a n/a
2010 9 0.8 10.5 66.7
2011 8 n/a n/a 37.5
2012 7 n/a n/a 57.1
2014 15 0.1 88.2 66.7
2015 7 n/a n/a 14.3
2016 19 n/a n/a 68.4
2017 14 0.5 27.4 50
2018 23 0.6 34.3 34.8
2019 34 1.0 34.0 47.1
2020 30 0.0 n/a 53.3
2021 31 n/a n/a 48.4
2022 19 0.0 n/a 15.8
2023 29 0.0 n/a 51.7
2024 10 1.0 10.0 70

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2019 $29,949

Data source: Minnesota Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students3429
 14.7%
African American169
 43.8%
American Indian00
Asian12
 100%
Hispanic13
 200%
Pacific Islander00
White1412
 14.3%
Two or More Races23
 50%
% Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients47.1%51.7%
 4.7%


Schools Near Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)









Frequently Asked Questions about Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)

In the 2023-24 school year, 10 students attended Central Middle Alternative (Cmap).

Students at Central Middle Alternative (Cmap) are 50% African American, 30% White, 20% Hispanic.


Rate Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Central Middle Alternative (Cmap)!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics

None retrieved from Database in 149 milliseconds.