Cold Stream Alternative

Public, Alternative K-12

 11661 Donner Pass Rd.
       Truckee, CA  96161-4953


(530) 582-2640

District: Tahoe-Truckee Unified

Per Pupil Expenditures:  $39,481 Help


Student/teacher ratio:  2.6 Help
Number of students:  13

Racial breakdown:

Hispanic:
61.5%
White:
38.5%

Free/discounted lunch recipients:  46.2% Help


 See top rated California public schools

 Compare Cold Stream Alternative to nearby alternative schools!

Performance Trends
Help
Compare Details Cold Stream Alternative is not ranked due for the most recent year due to insufficient test score data. (See more...)
Help
Compare Details In 2013 the calculated Average Standard Score was 4.99. (See more...)
Help
Chronic absenteeism in a school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student Body
Help
Compare Details Racial makeup is: Hispanic (61.5%), White (38.5%). (See more...)
Help
Compare Details 46.2% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. (See more...)
Teachers
Help
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Cold Stream Alternative is 2.6. (See more...)
Help
Compare Cold Stream Alternative employs 4.9 full-time teachers.
Finance
Help
Compare Details The average total spent per student at Cold Stream Alternative is $39,481.
Schooldigger Rankings:

Cold Stream Alternative was not ranked this year due to insufficient test score data.

Tahoe-Truckee Unified:

SchoolDigger ranks Tahoe-Truckee Unified 256th of 1568 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)


What do you think?

Your rating for Cold Stream Alternative?

Rank History for Cold Stream Alternative

Help
Compare
Year Avg Standard Score Statewide Rank Total # Ranked High Schools CA State Percentile SchoolDigger Rating
2004 60.46 332nd 1653 79.9%
2005 72.84 203rd 1901 89.3%
2006 44.36 747th 1968 62.0%
2007 54.12 561st 2063 72.8%
2008 46.02 766th 2117 63.8%
2009 28.36 1468th 2238 34.4%
2010 36.87 1087th 2281 52.3%
2011 5.02 2151st 2367 9.1%
2012 4.93 2139th 2354 9.1%
2013 4.99 2203rd 2426 9.2%
See the entire list of California Alternative School Rankings!

Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com

Cold Stream Alternative Test Scores
Tests: 
  
Grades: 
  
Years: 
  
Group by: 
District Scores:
State Scores:    



Data source: California Department of Education

We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Cold Stream Alternative.

If you have first-hand knowledge about Cold Stream Alternative, submit a rating!


Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!


Enrollment information for Cold Stream Alternative

Help
Compare
Year White African American Asian Hispanic American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Not Specified Total
1997 42 0 0 3 3 n/a n/a 0 48
1998 52 0 1 1 2 n/a n/a 0 56
1999 13 15 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 28
2000 24 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 24
2001 38 0 0 1 0 n/a n/a 0 39
2002 42 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 42
2003 42 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 42
2004 53 0 0 0 0 n/a n/a 0 53
2005 55 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a 0 56
2006 65 1 1 2 1 n/a n/a 0 70
2007 47 1 2 2 0 n/a n/a 0 52
2008 42 n/a n/a 4 1 n/a n/a 0 47
2009 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
2010 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
2011 22 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 28
2012 20 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 26
2013 25 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 30
2014 11 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 14
2015 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
2016 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 9
2017 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11
2018 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 15
2019 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
2020 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
2021 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2022 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
2023 5 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 14
2024 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 13

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Enrollment/Ethnicity

For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics

Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at Cold Stream Alternative

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1997 48 2.5 19.2 0
1998 56 2.4 23.3 0
1999 28 1.4 20.0 0
2000 24 3.0 8.0 0
2001 39 3.0 13.0 0
2002 42 2.0 21.0 2.4
2003 42 2.0 21.0 2.4
2004 53 2.0 26.5 1.9
2005 56 2.0 28.0 3.6
2006 70 2.0 35.0 4.3
2007 52 2.2 23.6 5.8
2008 47 2.0 23.5 10.6
2009 34 2.0 17.0 0
2010 29 1.7 17.0 6.9
2011 28 n/a n/a 10.7
2012 26 2.5 10.4 n/a
2013 30 3.0 10.0 13.3
2014 14 3.1 4.4 42.9
2015 7 3.0 2.3 14.3
2016 9 3.0 3.0 0
2017 11 3.1 3.4 27.3
2018 15 3.1 4.7 33.3
2019 6 3.1 1.8 n/a
2020 2 n/a n/a n/a
2021 1 3.6 0.2 n/a
2022 6 3.2 1.8 n/a
2023 14 4.4 3.1 42.9
2024 13 4.9 2.6 46.2

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.

Student/Teacher Ratio Cold Stream Alternative

Help
Compare
Year # Students Full-time Teachers Student/Teacher ratio % Free/Discounted Lunch
1997 48 2.5 19.2 0
1998 56 2.4 23.3 0
1999 28 1.4 20.0 0
2000 24 3.0 8.0 0
2001 39 3.0 13.0 0
2002 42 2.0 21.0 2.4
2003 42 2.0 21.0 2.4
2004 53 2.0 26.5 1.9
2005 56 2.0 28.0 3.6
2006 70 2.0 35.0 4.3
2007 52 2.2 23.6 5.8
2008 47 2.0 23.5 10.6
2009 34 2.0 17.0 0
2010 29 1.7 17.0 6.9
2011 28 n/a n/a 10.7
2012 26 2.5 10.4 n/a
2013 30 3.0 10.0 13.3
2014 14 3.1 4.4 42.9
2015 7 3.0 2.3 14.3
2016 9 3.0 3.0 0
2017 11 3.1 3.4 27.3
2018 15 3.1 4.7 33.3
2019 6 3.1 1.8 n/a
2020 2 n/a n/a n/a
2021 1 3.6 0.2 n/a
2022 6 3.2 1.8 n/a
2023 14 4.4 3.1 42.9
2024 13 4.9 2.6 46.2

Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.

About Student-Teacher Ratio

Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.
Finances

Per Pupil Expenditures for Cold Stream Alternative

Help

YearTotal Expenditures Per Pupil
2018 $39,481

Data source: California Department of Education
Pre and Post Pandemic Data

Impact of COVID-19 on Cold Stream Alternative

The coronavirus has had a profound impact on education in America. Learning shifted online overnight, attendance numbers dwindled, and enrollment decreased. SchoolDigger.com is making it easier for you to better assess how COVID-19 has impacted your school. Through the collection of pre-pandemic (2019) and current data, SchoolDigger.com is sharing test scores, enrollment numbers and school demographics from schools across the country – and we make it easy to see how impacted schools compare locally and statewide.

Student Body

Number of students
Pre-pandemic (2018-2019)
Number of students
Post pandemic (2022-2023)
Change (%)
Total Students614
 133.3%
African American00
American Indian00
Asian00
Hispanic07
Pacific Islander00
White55
Two or More Races12
 100%


Schools Near Cold Stream Alternative









Frequently Asked Questions about Cold Stream Alternative

In the 2023-24 school year, 13 students attended Cold Stream Alternative.

Students at Cold Stream Alternative are 62% Hispanic, 38% White.


Rate Cold Stream Alternative!



Sign up for updates!

Be the first to know when there is an update for Cold Stream Alternative!




SchoolDigger data sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Education.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS: Not all boundaries are included. We make every effort to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date. But it's important to note that these are approximations and are for general informational purposes only. To verify legal descriptions of boundaries or school locations, contact your local tax assessor's office and/or school district.





Diagnostics
h12_063877006175 retrieved from Memory in 0 milliseconds.
None retrieved from Database in 49 milliseconds.