Rank History for Surprise Valley High
Compare
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked Middle Schools |
CA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2009 |
86.46 |
156th |
2063 |
92.4% |
|
2022 |
50.91 |
1148th |
2740 |
58.1% |
|
2024 |
37.30 |
1549th |
2777 |
44.2% |
|
See the entire list of
California High School Rankings!
Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
Rank History for Surprise Valley High
Compare
Rank History for all high school students at Surprise Valley High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
CA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2004 |
74.75 |
122nd |
1653 |
92.6% |
|
2005 |
63.91 |
350th |
1901 |
81.6% |
|
2006 |
74.14 |
215th |
1968 |
89.1% |
|
2007 |
64.34 |
363rd |
2063 |
82.4% |
|
2008 |
81.18 |
111th |
2117 |
94.8% |
|
2009 |
38.10 |
1085th |
2238 |
51.5% |
|
2010 |
63.48 |
431st |
2281 |
81.1% |
|
2011 |
70.41 |
300th |
2367 |
87.3% |
|
2012 |
35.39 |
1168th |
2354 |
50.4% |
|
2013 |
32.90 |
1238th |
2426 |
49.0% |
|
2015 |
31.53 |
1315th |
1994 |
34.1% |
|
2023 |
29.36 |
1434th |
2348 |
38.9% |
|
2024 |
30.65 |
1403rd |
2323 |
39.6% |
|
See the entire list of
California High School Rankings!
Rank History for high school Female students at Surprise Valley High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
CA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2024 |
40.85 |
1063rd |
2098 |
49.3% |
|
See the entire list of
Best California High Schools for Female Students!
Rank History for high school White students at Surprise Valley High
Year |
Avg Standard Score |
Statewide Rank |
Total # Ranked High Schools |
CA State Percentile |
SchoolDigger Rating |
2023 |
7.88 |
1274th |
1434 |
11.2% |
|
See the entire list of
Best California High Schools for White Students!
Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.